An In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of 3D Printing Orientation on the Accuracy of Implant Surgical Templates Fabricated By Desktop Printer

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the effect of different 3D printing orientations on internal and seating accuracy of implant surgical templates fabricated by a digital light processing (DLP) printer. Materials and methods A single maxillary model with a missing central incisor was used to design a surgical template for single implant placement. According to the printing orientation, three surgical template groups were included in the study: horizontal (H), angled (A) and vertical (V) (n = 10). For the H group, the templates were produced parallel to the printing platform, while for the V group, the templates were perpendicular to the platform. The A group templates had a 45° angle orientation to the platform. Each template was scanned at the fitting surface and after seating on the master model. The internal accuracy involved measuring the trueness and precision of the internal surface, while for the seating accuracy, the vertical discrepancy after seating the template was measured. To determine the difference among the groups, ANOVA test was applied followed by Tukey post hoc tests (α = 0.05). Results The H group had the lowest internal surface inaccuracy (trueness = 100.7 μm; precision = 69.1 μm) followed by A (trueness = 114.0 μm; precision = 77.3 μm) and V (trueness = 120.3 μm; precision = 82.4 μm) groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, the H group had the most superior seating accuracy (543.8 μm) followed by A group (1006.0 μm) and V group (1278.0 μm), respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions The orientation of 3D printing of implant surgical templates fabricated by the DLP desktop printer influenced the accuracy of the templates. The horizontally printed templates consistently exhibited superior accuracy. To reduce deviation of implant placement, it is recommended to print the surgical templates with their largest dimension parallel to the printing platform.

Experimental study on dimensional variations of 3D printed dental models based on printing orientation

“…Hussein et al 27 concluded that build orientation had an influence on the accuracy of the 3D printed partial denture frameworks, especially at a 135-degree angle of maxillary design and 150-degree of mandibular design. Tahir et al 28 had a similar conclusion, that the horizontally printed surgical guides exhibited superior accuracy in comparison with those printed at 45° and 90° orientations. Ko et al 29 showed that build angle and layer height have statistically significant interactive effects on the accuracy of 3Dprinted dental models.…”

Additive manufacturing technologies in the oral implant clinic: A review of current applications and progress

“…Tahir et al evaluated the effect of different printing directions on the placement accuracy of implant surgical templates made by DLP. The results showed that the horizontally printed templates showed excellent accuracy (Tahir and Abduo, 2022).…”

Assessing the Impact of Resin Type, Post-Processing Technique, and Arch Location on the Trueness and Precision of 3D-Printed Full-Arch Implant Surgical Guides

“…This study utilised a DLP printer, an Asiga MAX UV (385 nm ultraviolet laser; Asiga, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia), and a desktop 3D consumer-level printer [1,22]. The reference STL images of the implant surgical guides were imported into the Asiga MAX UV slicing software (Asiga Composer, Asiga, Alexandria, New South Wales, Australia).…”