2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in vitro approach for comparative interspecies metabolism of agrochemicals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Being commercially available, liver S9 fractions are easily accessible and reliable. One of the advantages of using the S9 mix is that co-factors are already included and therefore is ready to use upon purchase [59]. Although this is a tremendous benefit when studying drug metabolism and DDIs in vitro, the S9 mix shows direct toxicity to the cells at the necessary working concentration [60].…”
Section: Liver S9 Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being commercially available, liver S9 fractions are easily accessible and reliable. One of the advantages of using the S9 mix is that co-factors are already included and therefore is ready to use upon purchase [59]. Although this is a tremendous benefit when studying drug metabolism and DDIs in vitro, the S9 mix shows direct toxicity to the cells at the necessary working concentration [60].…”
Section: Liver S9 Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major metabolites identified in the in vivo samples were the acetyl-conjugates, the phase 2 metabolites of the benzyl-amine moiety of the vipadenant. The reason for the difference of in vitro/vivo metabolites would be likely due to the limitation of metabolic enzymes or cofactors existing in the in vitro liver microsome compared to the whole in vivo system [28,29,30,31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the above‐mentioned reasons, the design of 3 × 3 × 3 (concentrations, time points, technical replicates of pooled test systems) would allow a reasonable setting to identify UHM and DHM, which may be less likely with simpler designs such as 1 concentration and incubation time (Whalley et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Overview Of the Structure And Key Points Of The Scientific Opinionmentioning
confidence: 99%