2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.11.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An in-tether sulfoxide chiral center influences the biophysical properties of the N-capped peptides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the PQPQ segment in both 16 and 17 is helical, chirally biased, and stabilized with respect to noncyclic sequence 14. Helix conformation control by stereocentres can be remote 46 . Here the nearest stereogenic centres are five atoms away from the foldamer helix at both C and N termini, which much contrasts with earlier examples of absolute handedness control 45 .…”
Section: Ribosomal Synthesis Of Macrocyclic Foldamer-peptide Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the PQPQ segment in both 16 and 17 is helical, chirally biased, and stabilized with respect to noncyclic sequence 14. Helix conformation control by stereocentres can be remote 46 . Here the nearest stereogenic centres are five atoms away from the foldamer helix at both C and N termini, which much contrasts with earlier examples of absolute handedness control 45 .…”
Section: Ribosomal Synthesis Of Macrocyclic Foldamer-peptide Hybridsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2016, Moore et al reported that an in-tether chiral center of stapled peptides influenced the secondary structures and binding affinities of the peptides . Meanwhile, we reported that a carbon chiral center precisely placed in a single-bonded tether dominates the backbone peptide’s helicity and biochemical and biophysical properties, including metabolic stability, cellular uptake, and target binding affinity. This chirality-induced helicity strategy (CIH) has been expanded from a hydrocarbon chiral center to in-tether sulfur-based chiral centers such as sulfilimines and sulfoxides. The CIH peptides provide a unique platform with which to evaluate solely conformational effects on the biophysical properties between peptide epimers. Precedent research indicated that amphipathic helices exhibit far greater cell permeability than similar sequences lacking helicity. , We also indicated that helical peptide epimers show significantly enhanced cellular uptakes compared with nonhelical epimers. , Notably, we also reported that the substituent at the in-tether chiral center significantly influences the cellular uptakes and target-binding affinities of the peptides …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the cyclic nine-residue scaffold (1Y)i nI dp rotein bindinga nd inhibition wass lightly superior to that of the linear 11-residue peptide ( 2). Moreover,t he former offers the possibility to better control the three-dimensionals tructure of the binding peptide, which will facilitate the design of Id protein inhibitors with enhanced protein-binding affinity in the future,e .g.,b yv arying the hydrophobic three-residuem otif F(i)ÀF(i + 3)ÀF(i + 6), by using alternative tethered peptides [59][60][61] or foldamers. [62,63]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%