2002
DOI: 10.5006/1.3280789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An In-Situ Galvanically Coupled Multielectrode Array Sensor for Localized Corrosion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…WBE, [36][37][38][39][40][41] CMAS 42 or any other 10,15,23 ) exposed to an electrolyte at OCP. In order to satisfy the principle of conservation of charge, the summation of the net current measured at all the electrodes must equal zero.…”
Section: Calculation Of Metal Loss Distribution Based Of Faraday'smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WBE, [36][37][38][39][40][41] CMAS 42 or any other 10,15,23 ) exposed to an electrolyte at OCP. In order to satisfy the principle of conservation of charge, the summation of the net current measured at all the electrodes must equal zero.…”
Section: Calculation Of Metal Loss Distribution Based Of Faraday'smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional electrochemically integrated electrode arrays such as the wire beam electrode (WBE) 36-41 and the coupled multielectrode array sensor (CMAS) 42 have been previously used to study non-homogeneous corrosion conditions. The DAS takes advantage of the higher spatial and temporal resolution of the WBE compared to segmented electrodes used in …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another limitation of these methods is that they are based on ideally homogenous electrodes and could only provide spatially averaged corrosion information. In an attempt to evaluate the maximum local corrosion rate produced under CP, Sun 10,11 used the method developed by Yang et al 12 based on a coupled multi-electrode array to estimate the largest anodic current density based on statistical parameters by assuming that the local current densities measured at each electrode follow a normal distribution. Unfortunately they did not correlate individual local current density values with visual observation of localized corrosion damage on the array.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identical electrodes were used as the working, counter, and reference electrodes for LPR measurements. A CMAS measuring system described in [6] was used with the CMAS probes. A multichannel potentiostat was used to automatically conduct the polarization on the LPR electrodes for corrosion rate measurements and to measure the open circuit potential of the electrodes between the polarization measurements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%