An in-silico framework for modeling optimal control of neural systems

Abstract

IntroductionBrain-machine interfaces have reached an unprecedented capacity to measure and drive activity in the brain, allowing restoration of impaired sensory, cognitive or motor function. Classical control theory is pushed to its limit when aiming to design control laws that are suitable for large-scale, complex neural systems. This work proposes a scalable, data-driven, unified approach to study brain-machine-environment interaction using established tools from dynamical systems, optimal control theory, and deep learning.MethodsTo unify the methodology, we define the environment, neural system, and prosthesis in terms of differential equations with learnable parameters, which effectively reduce to recurrent neural networks in the discrete-time case. Drawing on tools from optimal control, we describe three ways to train the system: Direct optimization of an objective function, oracle-based learning, and reinforcement learning. These approaches are adapted to different assumptions about knowledge of system equations, linearity, differentiability, and observability.ResultsWe apply the proposed framework to train an in-silico neural system to perform tasks in a linear and a nonlinear environment, namely particle stabilization and pole balancing. After training, this model is perturbed to simulate impairment of sensor and motor function. We show how a prosthetic controller can be trained to restore the behavior of the neural system under increasing levels of perturbation.DiscussionWe expect that the proposed framework will enable rapid and flexible synthesis of control algorithms for neural prostheses that reduce the need for in-vivo testing. We further highlight implications for sparse placement of prosthetic sensor and actuator components.

A 128-channel real-time VPDNN stimulation system for a visual cortical neuroprosthesis

“…The VPDNN outputs are used by the stimulation ASIC to produce the currents needed by a demonstrator. Future work is planned for the use of this system in driving implantable electrodes [26] and using simultaneous recorded responses as feedback [27], [28].…”