2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2938831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improvement of the Performance of SAR Offset Tracking Approach to Measure Optimal Surface Displacements

Abstract: For the measurement of abrupt and large surface movements caused by earthquakes, volcanic eruption and melting glacier, Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) offset tracking method would be a feasible solution because it can provide unambiguous ground displacements in both the ground range and azimuth directions when the interferometric phase is not coherent. However, the measurement performance of the method largely depends on the kernel size, which denotes the size of search window to estimate the azimuth and range… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, as the kernel size is smaller, the measurement accuracy is much lower but the spatial resolution is much higher while the measurement accuracy is higher, but the spatial resolution is lower, as the kernel size is larger. It means that the measurement accuracy and spatial resolution have a trade-off relation 24,[36][37][38] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2, as the kernel size is smaller, the measurement accuracy is much lower but the spatial resolution is much higher while the measurement accuracy is higher, but the spatial resolution is lower, as the kernel size is larger. It means that the measurement accuracy and spatial resolution have a trade-off relation 24,[36][37][38] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main processing steps are composed of the following three parts: (a) Generating initial OT maps 24,41 . (b) Conducting error mitigation 24,[36][37][38]41 . (c) Mapping 3D surface deformation 16,40,42 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations