2016 International Conference on Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/ccaa.2016.7813740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improvement in BLEU metric for English-Hindi machine translation evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tamil to English Cross Lingual Information Retrieval System for Agricultural Domain Using SVM’ uses one such approach of machine translation where a bilingual dictionary for translating the user queries and n‐gram‐based approach are used to recover the problem of Word Sense Disambiguation (Saravanan & Sathish, 2016). Other language translations from English to Marathi (Salunkhe et al, 2016), English to Hindi (Malik & Baghel, 2016), and English to Arabic (Shaalan et al, 2010) have been carried out for the agricultural domain as well. Marian (Junczys‐Dowmunt et al, 2018) is a self‐contained Neural Machine translation framework developed on C++ to perform machine translation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tamil to English Cross Lingual Information Retrieval System for Agricultural Domain Using SVM’ uses one such approach of machine translation where a bilingual dictionary for translating the user queries and n‐gram‐based approach are used to recover the problem of Word Sense Disambiguation (Saravanan & Sathish, 2016). Other language translations from English to Marathi (Salunkhe et al, 2016), English to Hindi (Malik & Baghel, 2016), and English to Arabic (Shaalan et al, 2010) have been carried out for the agricultural domain as well. Marian (Junczys‐Dowmunt et al, 2018) is a self‐contained Neural Machine translation framework developed on C++ to perform machine translation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The configuration in PatchGAN uses Convolution-Batch Norm-Leaky ReLU layers block and the number specifies the number of filters. It is designed with the size of the receptive field, sometimes referred to as the effective receptive field [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. The model output can be a distinct value or a square value activation map predicting about each patch in the input picture is real or fake.…”
Section: Discriminator (Patchgan Architecture)mentioning
confidence: 99%