2009
DOI: 10.2528/pier08111803
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Two-Scale Model With Volume Scattering for the Dynamic Ocean Surface

Abstract: Abstract-The effects of the surface slopes joint probability density, the shadowing function, the skewness of sea waves and the curvature of the surface on the backscattering from the ocean surface are discussed and an improved two-scale model modified by these four aspects is used to calculate the backscattering coefficient of the dynamic ocean surface. In order to deal with the surface skewness driven by wind, a new complementary term derived from the small perturbation method is included in the improved mod… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that the mean motion of clutter is zero, with a velocity spread of 1 m/s due to random motions of the ocean surface and spacecraft. The ocean component is expected to dominate; if twoscale scattering theory (e.g., [6]) holds, the Doppler spectrum width should be determined by the wave orbital motions of the long wave spectrum. Measurements indicate that the ocean Doppler width should be less than about 1 m/s [7].…”
Section: Clutter Suppression Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that the mean motion of clutter is zero, with a velocity spread of 1 m/s due to random motions of the ocean surface and spacecraft. The ocean component is expected to dominate; if twoscale scattering theory (e.g., [6]) holds, the Doppler spectrum width should be determined by the wave orbital motions of the long wave spectrum. Measurements indicate that the ocean Doppler width should be less than about 1 m/s [7].…”
Section: Clutter Suppression Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a whole, methods in studying the rough surface scattering can be categorized into two kinds: (a) the approximate, analytical methods; (b) the numerical methods. The approximate methods mainly include: the small-perturbation method (SPM) [1], the Kirchhoff or tangent plane approximation (KA) [2], the physical optics (PO) method, the two-scale method (TSM) [3], the phase perturbation method (PPM) [4], the small-slope approximation (SSA) [5], etc. The numerical methods mainly include: the method of moments (MOM) [6], finite difference time domain (FDTD) [7] method, finite element method (FEM) [8], method of multiple interactions (MOMI), Banded-Matrix-Iterative-Approach/Canonical Grid (BMIA/CAG) [9], forward-backward method (FBM) [10], fast multipole method (FMM) [11,12], curvilinear coordinate (C) method [13], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can see that the observed clutter has a very complex constructive/destructive interference. According to this interference pattern, the modeled clutter (note that the surface scattering theories are used in the modeling [23][24][25]) based on the four-parameter refractivity profile matches the observed clutter better than that based on the log linear profile. The clutter from the log linear M-profile very poorly matches the observed clutter power.…”
Section: Advantagesmentioning
confidence: 99%