2018
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2018.2807420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Two-Coil Configuration for Low-Frequency Magnetic Field Immunity Tests and Its Field Inhomogeneity Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They were able to prove that the two-coil system had similar results as the Helmholtz coil system with reduced mass and lower electrical dissipation. 46…”
Section: Magnetic Field Immunity the Cables And Wiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were able to prove that the two-coil system had similar results as the Helmholtz coil system with reduced mass and lower electrical dissipation. 46…”
Section: Magnetic Field Immunity the Cables And Wiresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Equation 2is parameterized to obtain the function distribution of the maximum, minimum, and uniformity of the magnetic field to unknown parameters in the test area. The expressions for the function distribution are given [16] .…”
Section: A Magnetic Field Model Of the Square Coilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Helmholtz coil structure has been studied the most because it has a simple structure and can be applied in most situations. The configuration, principle, and optimization of a Helmholtz coil are described and analyzed in detail in [6]- [16]. For applications that require a higher magnetic field uniformity, multi-coil systems can be used to solve the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the immunity test method proposed by the ITER organization, three main parameters are introduced to identify the test magnetic field zone, which are (1) the side length of the cubic test zone (denoted as s ), (2) the maximum axial magnetic flux density in the test zone (denoted as B z max ), and (3) the magnetic field inhomogeneity (denoted as η ), which is defined as the ratio of the maximum to the minimum magnetic flux density in the zone [7]. The above three parameters together specify the dimension, intensity, and homogeneity of the required test field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, massive coil turns or even busbar with a large cross-section area will be employed when a high-intensity magnetic field is required, where the cross-section effect is considerable. So far, although a few studies have analysed the influence of the cross-section effect [7,15,16], optimization that takes into account the effect is not considered. This is an important issue for such applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%