2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2017.04.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved time-dependent Boundary Element Method for two-dimensional acoustic problems in a subsonic uniform flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precisely, the BEM formulations have important advantages over the FEM solutions for solving the propagation and radiation problems with mean flow, such as the mesh generation and the CPU time. 39 For 3 D and 2 D domains, the boundary element methods have an integration terms over surfaces and its generators and the finite element methods have integration terms over volumes and its surfaces, respectively. Thus, it can be deduced that the BEM approach reduces the mesh model by one-dimensional, comparing to FEM approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Precisely, the BEM formulations have important advantages over the FEM solutions for solving the propagation and radiation problems with mean flow, such as the mesh generation and the CPU time. 39 For 3 D and 2 D domains, the boundary element methods have an integration terms over surfaces and its generators and the finite element methods have integration terms over volumes and its surfaces, respectively. Thus, it can be deduced that the BEM approach reduces the mesh model by one-dimensional, comparing to FEM approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main disadvantages of using classical modal Helmholtz integral formulations are the complexity of transformation methods, 36 the convection effects, 30 the singular integrations, 26 the convected free terms, 28 and the nonreflecting boundary conditions. 39…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations