2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2019.2918985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Symbol-Flipping Algorithm for Nonbinary LDPC Codes and its Application to NAND Flash Memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equation (28) identifies and removes those variable nodes which are common in equation (26) and (27). This helps to decide the number of flipping positions in ψ ψ ψ as subset to T .…”
Section: Multiple Symbol Flipping Bit Reliability Based Decoding Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Equation (28) identifies and removes those variable nodes which are common in equation (26) and (27). This helps to decide the number of flipping positions in ψ ψ ψ as subset to T .…”
Section: Multiple Symbol Flipping Bit Reliability Based Decoding Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this algorithm, the successful and failed checks are isolated as shown in equations (26), (27) and (28). The set of the variable nodes that contributed to the failed checks, helps to decide which symbol position should be flipped and how many positions needs to be flipped.…”
Section: Multiple Symbol Flipping Prediction Based Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, for NAND flash memory, high data throughput is crucial. Therefore, quite a few schemes have focused on reducing the decoding complexity of the NB-LDPC codes for NAND flash memory [4]- [10]. Moreover, the reliability of flash memory cells continues to degrade owing to the rapid increase in storage density via multi-level data cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there are three types of algorithms for reducing the decoding complexity of NB-LDPC codes: simplified belief propagation decoding (SBPD) [14]- [17], symbol flipping decoding (SFD) [4], [18]- [22], and majority-logic decoding (MLgD) [23]- [26] algorithms. The SBPD algorithms outperform the other two types, but their computational complexity is higher than that of the other two.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%