2018 International Conference on Data Science and Engineering (ICDSE) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icdse.2018.8527737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Spam Detection Method with Weighted Support Vector Machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e increase in the weight value can reduce the email misclassification. Experiments show that the performance of the spam detection system still needs to be improved in terms of precision and accuracy [14]. Karhika and Visalakshi described a method of spam classification implementing and combining and implementing the ant colony optimization and support vector machine methods.…”
Section: Rule-based Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e increase in the weight value can reduce the email misclassification. Experiments show that the performance of the spam detection system still needs to be improved in terms of precision and accuracy [14]. Karhika and Visalakshi described a method of spam classification implementing and combining and implementing the ant colony optimization and support vector machine methods.…”
Section: Rule-based Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 summarizes the environment and data in which the methodology was tested; performance was evaluated in terms of accuracy (ACC), F1-score (F1), precision (P), and recall (R). Downloaded datasets and existing methods in the literature [24,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] were used for performance evaluation assuming an anonymous attack through malicious email. As a result of classification, liked and separated corpus were distinguished.…”
Section: The Expression Is As Followsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with Vishagini et al, the researchers have assessed the effect of spam detection using SVM, WSVM with KPCM, and WSVM with KFCM. [16].…”
Section: Parallel Recent Research Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%