2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/1260196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Shuffled Frog Leaping Algorithm for Multiload AGV Dispatching in Automated Container Terminals

Abstract: Multiload AGVs, which can carry more than one container at a time, are widely used in automated container terminals. The dispatching decisions for multiload AGVs serving in automated container terminals on the target of minimum travel distance are significant in the process of container transportation in terms of improving operating efficiency. Previous work usually focused on AGVs working in a single-carrier mode, which was not only inconsistent with actual circumstances but also a waste of resources. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Jin and Mi (2019) constructed a multi-objective integer programming model with the objective of minimizing the sum of container handling capacity, AGV movement and weight differences between containers, and they transformed it into linear constraints for solution, which has great practical value for improving port productivity. Ma et al (2020) established a mathematical model for the operation of multi load AGV in the automatic container terminal with the minimum moving distance as the goal, and used a mutation frog jump algorithm based on priority rules to solve it, which is of great significance to improve the operational efficiency. Xu et al (2020) pointed out that efficient AGV scheduling is the key to improving the throughput of automated container terminals, and the realization of two-way loading of AGV can significantly improve the port handling efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Jin and Mi (2019) constructed a multi-objective integer programming model with the objective of minimizing the sum of container handling capacity, AGV movement and weight differences between containers, and they transformed it into linear constraints for solution, which has great practical value for improving port productivity. Ma et al (2020) established a mathematical model for the operation of multi load AGV in the automatic container terminal with the minimum moving distance as the goal, and used a mutation frog jump algorithm based on priority rules to solve it, which is of great significance to improve the operational efficiency. Xu et al (2020) pointed out that efficient AGV scheduling is the key to improving the throughput of automated container terminals, and the realization of two-way loading of AGV can significantly improve the port handling efficiency.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e speed of handling device, waiting time between devices, failure rate, and other factors will cause the change of target value. After obtaining the historical data of terminal operation, the missing data will be supplemented by Equation (6).…”
Section: Model Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhong et al [5] established the architecture of commandand-control system using the multiagent technology and realized the improvement of operation efficiency when ensuring the safe operation of the terminal. Ma et al [6] used the mutation hybrid frog leaping algorithm to improve the efficiency of horizontal transportation. However, researchers mostly focus on the analysis of historical data and seldom consider the real-time and virtual data for the operation of the ACT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motivated by our collaboration with the TC, the main novelty of our problem setting in contrast to the existing literature is constituted by the combination of the following features. First, we specifically focused on solving the scheduling problems right on time, whereas the methods in most studies consume unreasonable computational effort, in particular, some exact methods (Schiffer and Walther, 2017 ; Ma et al, 2020 ; Singh et al, 2022 ). Second, the AGVs considered in this study are heterogeneous in terms of battery management, travel speed, and capabilities to perform transportation of different types of materials, which increases the complexity of the problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%