2020
DOI: 10.5194/wes-5-1037-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved second-order dynamic stall model for wind turbine airfoils

Abstract: Abstract. Robust and accurate dynamic stall modeling remains one of the most difficult tasks in wind turbine load calculations despite its long research effort in the past. In the present paper, a new second-order dynamic stall model is developed with the main aim to model the higher harmonics of the vortex shedding while retaining its robustness for various flow conditions and airfoils. Comprehensive investigations and tests are performed at various flow conditions. The occurring physical characteristics for … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples are the Boeing-Vertol Gamma function method by Gross and Harris (1969) and Gormont (1973), the ONERA method (Tran and Petot 1981), and the Leishman-Beddoes method (Leishman and Beddoes 1989). While these are first-order models, there are also several second order models such as the Snel model (Snel 1997), Hopf-Biffurcation model (Truong 1993), IAG model (Bangga et al 2020b), and Adema-Snel model (Adema et al 2020). Although there are many more studies available in literature that are dedicated to dynamic stall modeling, industry is still relying mostly on the very basic classical dynamic stall models such as the Leishman-Beddoes model or the Snel models.…”
Section: Modeling Dynamic Stallmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Examples are the Boeing-Vertol Gamma function method by Gross and Harris (1969) and Gormont (1973), the ONERA method (Tran and Petot 1981), and the Leishman-Beddoes method (Leishman and Beddoes 1989). While these are first-order models, there are also several second order models such as the Snel model (Snel 1997), Hopf-Biffurcation model (Truong 1993), IAG model (Bangga et al 2020b), and Adema-Snel model (Adema et al 2020). Although there are many more studies available in literature that are dedicated to dynamic stall modeling, industry is still relying mostly on the very basic classical dynamic stall models such as the Leishman-Beddoes model or the Snel models.…”
Section: Modeling Dynamic Stallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are many more studies available in literature that are dedicated to dynamic stall modeling, industry is still relying mostly on the very basic classical dynamic stall models such as the Leishman-Beddoes model or the Snel models. This is mainly because of the simplicity to tune these models for different airfoils and various flow conditions (Bangga et al 2020b).…”
Section: Modeling Dynamic Stallmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models can produce reasonable results while still maintaining low computational burden. The models from Beddoes and Leishman (BL) and its derivatives [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] are considered to be the industry standard for wind turbine design process. The models are commonly derived by combining a time delay of the angle of attack with an approximate solution of flow separation during the dynamic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model was further extended in [25]. Bangga et al [13] combined the state-of-the-art BL model and the second order term of the Snel model to predict the unsteady characteristics of wind turbine airfoils, hereby referred to as the "IAG dynamic stall model". Several improvements were made to enhance the accuracy of the first order and the second order terms [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It models the dynamic stall effect with a set of differential equations that, divided into modules, describe different flow states, such as unsteady attached flow, unsteady separated flow and dynamic stall. Recently, there have been attempts to further improve this model by also predicting second-order lift and drag forces (Bangga et al, 2020). Common to all of these models is that there is a set of static parameters that are tuned so that the predicted results fit the phase-averaged experimental data as well as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%