2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13126711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Revenue Distribution Model for Logistics Service Supply Chain Considering Fairness Preference

Abstract: Revenue distribution is an important issue in the operations of a logistics service supply chain (LSSC). The existing works on revenue distribution are mostly based on the assumption of rational economic people that are purely self-interested. However, people also have a fairness preference, which impacts people’s decision-making behavior or even the success operations of the LSSC. For a two-level supply chain consisting of logistics service integrator (LSI) and several functional logistics service providers (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm uses the fitness value of each individual particle's current position, and assigns these particles a suitable order according to the fitness value of each particle, and then assigns good positions and velocities to the group with poor fitness values. Individuals, where the second half of the whole ranking with low fitness value is defined as the individual with poor fitness value, maintain the best position of each individual [21]. Therefore, the group can concentrate on the space with relatively good fitness value, and at the same time, it is also affected by the individual's own memory of retaining the best previous position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm uses the fitness value of each individual particle's current position, and assigns these particles a suitable order according to the fitness value of each particle, and then assigns good positions and velocities to the group with poor fitness values. Individuals, where the second half of the whole ranking with low fitness value is defined as the individual with poor fitness value, maintain the best position of each individual [21]. Therefore, the group can concentrate on the space with relatively good fitness value, and at the same time, it is also affected by the individual's own memory of retaining the best previous position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides an overview of the concept of fairness and its dimensions from a general perspective. It incorporates the concepts of distributive fairness, interpreted as the fairness of price received (Adams, 1965;Bolton et al, 2003;Haitao Cui et al, 2007;Gielissen and Graafland, 2009;Zitzmann and Dobhan, 2010;Briggeman and Lusk, 2011;Lu et al, 2021), procedural fairness, the perceived fairness of the procedures used to determine price distributions (Thibaut and Walker, 1978), interactional fairness, the quality of employees' interpersonal treatment (Bies and Moag, 1986;Colquitt et al, 2001), and environmental fairness, respect for the environment (Food Ethics Council, 2020). Past research conceptualised interactional fairness as the third dimension of fairness (Colquitt et al, 2001) or as the social part of procedural fairness (Folger and Konovsky, 1989).…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stock products will be participated in the distribution of the next period. Additionally, each retailer is distributed by one distribution center, however, the distribution center can serve different retailers [22]. 5) Push-pull junction point…”
Section: ) Distribution Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%