2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-019-08332-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved residual network model for image recognition using a combination of snapshot ensembles and the cutout technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our system only needs to update the distribution of labels in corresponding environment, which is easier than the re-training or transferring of models. We performed our system and existing methods on the samples of CIFAR-10 [12][13][14], CIFAR-100 [15][16][17] and Mini-ImageNet [18][19][20]. All of these evaluations proved the effectiveness of our system.…”
Section: Figure 1: How the Distribution Of Labels Increases The Accur...mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our system only needs to update the distribution of labels in corresponding environment, which is easier than the re-training or transferring of models. We performed our system and existing methods on the samples of CIFAR-10 [12][13][14], CIFAR-100 [15][16][17] and Mini-ImageNet [18][19][20]. All of these evaluations proved the effectiveness of our system.…”
Section: Figure 1: How the Distribution Of Labels Increases The Accur...mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…CIFAR-100 has 100 classes and each class contains 600 images [15][16][17]. We separate each class of the dataset to 500 training samples and 100 testing ones.…”
Section: Random Case On Cifar-100 and Mini-imagenetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CIFAR-100 is similar to the CIFAR-10. This set has 100 classes and each class has 600 images [14][15][16]. 50000 training samples are to train the models.…”
Section: The Evaluation On Cifar-10 and Cifar-100mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using fusion method, the classification accuracy may be increased. We evaluated the methods on some real datasets that include CIFAR-10 [11-13] and CIFAR-100 [14][15][16]. Furthermore, we also collected a real dataset where the samples have different resolution and each label has different number of samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Model T-IM SENNs [18] 78.5% ResNet-34 [29] 52.0% DE-CapsNet [30] 93.0% VGG 16 [31] 52.2% VGG-19 [32] 93.4% VGG 16 + aug [31] 56.4% ResNet-110 [33] 93.6% IRRCNN [34] 52.2% DenseNet [35] 94.8% ResNet-110 [36] 56.6% WRN-28-2 [37] 94.9% WRN-40-20 [38] 63.8% 2) and ( 5)). Further, E(x) denotes that a learnt embedding was used as input to the model (see sec.…”
Section: Model C10mentioning
confidence: 99%