2020
DOI: 10.21660/2020.65.9139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Prediction Model for Bond Strength of Deformed Bars in Rc Using Upv Test and Artificial Neural Network

Abstract: The composite action of reinforcement in the surrounding concrete involve a complex and nonlinear mechanism. Inadequate understanding of the underlying interactions may lead to designs with insufficient amount of bond resistance of reinforcing bars in concrete structures. To investigate the effects of various parameters on the bond strength of steel bars in concrete, 54 cube samples with varying embedded reinforcements and strengths were prepared. The samples were cured for 28 days and tested using ultrasonic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concrete strength varied from 24.82 to 40.10 MPa with a mean strength fcm of 33.30 MPa. A linear relationship between fc and n with ST = 1.72 MPa was found as: 7) and (9).…”
Section: Ultimate Strength Of Rc Column In Combined Bending and Compr...mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The concrete strength varied from 24.82 to 40.10 MPa with a mean strength fcm of 33.30 MPa. A linear relationship between fc and n with ST = 1.72 MPa was found as: 7) and (9).…”
Section: Ultimate Strength Of Rc Column In Combined Bending and Compr...mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Sanchez et al used observation data from rebound hammer tests on a RC bridge beam to update a probabilistic prediction of flexural failure of the beam due to carbonation [8]. Concha and Oreta utilized data acquired from UPV testing of concrete specimens to develop a neural network model for the prediction of the bond strength of rebars in concrete structures [9]. Using a rebound hammer together with UPV and compression tests, Qasrawi observed variation in strength among concrete cores taken from different positions along column length [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers tried to develop various relationships between the measured indicators and the mechanical properties of concrete, by using different techniques, such as response surface (RS) [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], data fusion (DF) [35][36][37], and artificial neural networks (ANN) [38][39][40][41][42][43]. The empirical relationships developed over the years have a different structure: linear (LN) [40,41], polynomial (PL) [44,45], and power (PW) [46,47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers tried to develop various relationships between the measured indicators and the mechanical properties of concrete, by using different techniques, such as response surface (RS) [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], data fusion (DF) [35][36][37], and artificial neural networks (ANN) [38][39][40][41][42][43]. The empirical relationships developed over the years have a different structure: linear (LN) [40,41], polynomial (PL) [44,45], and power (PW) [46,47].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%