1987
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1987.1144117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved pencil-of-functions method and comparisons with traditional methods of pole extraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It consists of comparing an unknown target with a set of targets stored in a library. A maximum correlation between two targets means that they are similar or identical depending on the correlation coefficient r u,s (11).…”
Section: A Identification By Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It consists of comparing an unknown target with a set of targets stored in a library. A maximum correlation between two targets means that they are similar or identical depending on the correlation coefficient r u,s (11).…”
Section: A Identification By Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of other techniques for resonance extraction have been introduced, including the pencil-of-function methods [34,48,59] and several nonlinear [38,47,58] and combined linear-nonlinear (7,141 least square approaches. In addition, Ksienski [411 has outlined the benefits of using multiple data sets, while Baum has stressed the importance of incorporating a priori information about the scatterer [36].…”
Section: Extension To Scattered Far Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,3 Such characterization provides sufficient information about system damping when its transient response is analyzed. The main subcategories of SEM for extracting systems' complex poles and their associated residues are Prony method, 4 Jain's pencil-of-function (POF) method 5,6 and its improved version, 7 ESPRIT, 8 and generalized pencil-of-function (GPOF).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%