2024
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c02129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved PDE6D Inhibitor Combines with Sildenafil To Inhibit KRAS Mutant Cancer Cell Growth

Pelin Kaya,
Elisabeth Schaffner-Reckinger,
Ganesh babu Manoharan
et al.

Abstract: The trafficking chaperone PDE6D (or PDEδ) was proposed as a surrogate target for K-Ras, leading to the development of a series of inhibitors that block its prenyl binding pocket. These inhibitors suffered from low solubility and suspected off-target effects, preventing their clinical development. Here, we developed a highly soluble, low nanomolar PDE6D inhibitor (PDE6Di), Deltaflexin3, which has the lowest off-target activity as compared to three prominent reference compounds. Deltaflexin3 reduces Ras signalin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From this representation one can also identify the optimal A/D-plasmid ratio (here at A/D = ~10:1) for dose-response experiments (Figure 2A). Under these conditions the BRET-ratio response of the BRETbiosensor depends pseudo-linearly on manipulations that affect the interaction, such as drugtreatments 12 . The preferred format employs the expression signal ratio on the x-axis, as it is derived from measured signal values (Figure 2B).…”
Section: Expected Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this representation one can also identify the optimal A/D-plasmid ratio (here at A/D = ~10:1) for dose-response experiments (Figure 2A). Under these conditions the BRET-ratio response of the BRETbiosensor depends pseudo-linearly on manipulations that affect the interaction, such as drugtreatments 12 . The preferred format employs the expression signal ratio on the x-axis, as it is derived from measured signal values (Figure 2B).…”
Section: Expected Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%