2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.09.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved multislope MUSCL scheme for solving shallow water equations on unstructured grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, MWDG2 predictions at ε = 10 −2 can be deemed acceptable: beside the sources of uncertainty in this test (sensitivity to the choice of the Manning's coefficient and errors in experimental data measurement), its predictions are found to be in a better agreement with measured data compared with other predictions made by a second-order finite volume solver (FV2) on a triangular mesh type (Zhao et al, 2019), and by a third-order MWDG (MWDG3) solver designed with different treatments to achieve well-balancedness with wetting and drying (Caviedes-Voullième et al, 2020).…”
Section: Malpasset Dam-breakmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, MWDG2 predictions at ε = 10 −2 can be deemed acceptable: beside the sources of uncertainty in this test (sensitivity to the choice of the Manning's coefficient and errors in experimental data measurement), its predictions are found to be in a better agreement with measured data compared with other predictions made by a second-order finite volume solver (FV2) on a triangular mesh type (Zhao et al, 2019), and by a third-order MWDG (MWDG3) solver designed with different treatments to achieve well-balancedness with wetting and drying (Caviedes-Voullième et al, 2020).…”
Section: Malpasset Dam-breakmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this final test, the MWDG2 and HFV1 solvers are studied to replicate the Malpasset dam break. This test case is frequently used as a benchmark test for shallow water numerical models (Hervouet and Petitjean, 1999;Valiani et al, 2002;Brufau et al, 2004;Liang et al, 2007;Shi and Nguyen, 2008;Wang et al, 2011;Delis et al, 2011;Kesserwani and Liang, 2012a;Guermond et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2019). The Malpasset dam was located in the Reyran river valley in France.…”
Section: Malpasset Dam-breakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-established test case by Thacker (1981) for a periodic oscillation of a planar surface in a frictionless paraboloid has been extensively used for validation of shallow-water solvers (e.g. Aureli et al, 2008;Dazzi et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2015;Murillo and García-Navarro, 2010;Vacondio et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 2019) because of its rather complex 2D nature and the presence of moving wet-dry fronts. The topography is defined as…”
Section: Analytical Oscillation: Parabolic Bowlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Malpasset dam-break event Hervouet and Petitjean (1999) is the most commonly used real-scale benchmark test in shallow water modelling (An et al, 2015;Brodtkorb et al, 2012;Brufau et al, 2004;Caviedes-Voullième et al, 2020b;Duran et al, 2013;George, 2010;Hervouet and Petitjean, 1999;Hou et al, 2013a;Kesserwani and Liang, 2012;Kesserwani and Sharifian, 2020;Kim et al, 2014;Liang et al, 2007;Saetra et al, 2015;Schwanenberg and Harms, 2004;Smith and Liang, 2013;Valiani et al, 2002;Xia et al, 2011;Yu and Duan, 2012;Wang et al, 2011;Zhou et al, 2013;Zhao et al, 2019). Although it may not be particularly challenging for current solvers, it remains an interesting case due to its scale, and the available field and experimental data (Aureli et al, 2021).…”
Section: Malpasset Dam-breakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This case has been extensively used for validation of shallow water solvers, for example (Aureli et al, 2008;Dazzi et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2015;Murillo and García-Navarro, 2010;Vacondio et al, 2014;Zhao et al, 2019), because of its rather complex Period T = 2.242851 s 2D nature and the presence of moving wet/dry fronts. The topography is again given by Equation 8with the same choice of parameters and discretisation as before.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%