2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0038617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved multiphase lattice Boltzmann flux solver for the simulation of incompressible flow with large density ratio and complex interface

Abstract: The recently developed multiphase lattice Boltzmann flux solver (MLBFS) overcomes the limitations in the multiphase lattice Boltzmann method (MLBM), such as the coupled time step and mesh step, uniform meshes, and complex distribution functions (DFs) treatment at the boundary. Unlike the original MLBFS deduced from the standard lattice Boltzmann method, an improved multiphase lattice Boltzmann flux solver (IMLBFS) is proposed based on the Chapman–Enskog analysis of the MLBM which has a source term stemming fro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aiming to unify the different computational frameworks for velocity and phase fields, an interfacial lattice Boltzmann flux solver (ILBFS) [23] was proposed to solve the Cahn-Hilliard equation. Based on ILBFS, a simplified MLBFS with slight simplification in interface fluxes [24] and an improved MLBFS (IMLBFS) [25] based on the original phase-field-based multiphase lattice Boltzmann model (MLBM) [26] were proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aiming to unify the different computational frameworks for velocity and phase fields, an interfacial lattice Boltzmann flux solver (ILBFS) [23] was proposed to solve the Cahn-Hilliard equation. Based on ILBFS, a simplified MLBFS with slight simplification in interface fluxes [24] and an improved MLBFS (IMLBFS) [25] based on the original phase-field-based multiphase lattice Boltzmann model (MLBM) [26] were proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for the good numerical stability of the original MLBFS was thought to be using the lattice Boltzmann model [21]. IMLBFS is believed to be more stable than the original MLBFS because it is derived from the multiphase lattice Boltzmann model and thus has a more robust physical basis [25]. The reason for the good numerical stability of SMLBM is recognized as that SMLBM inherits the good stability feature of the reconstruction strategy [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These deficiencies make it difficult for standard LBM or LLBM to simulate acoustic wave propagation. To solve these deficiencies, Shu et al proposed the lattice Boltzmann flux solver (LBFS) employing the finite volume method to calculate the flux at an interface [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Zhan et al further developed a linearized lattice Boltzmann flux solver (LLBFS) suitable for acoustic propagation simulation [ 31 ], wherein the solution of the interface satisfies the lattice Boltzmann equation; this is more in line with physical laws, and the calculation load is comparable to the traditional flux scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, the initial distribution function is given from the first-order Chapman-Enskog (C-E) expansion. [23][24][25][26] It is indeed the distribution function truncated to the NS level. After some transformation, this distribution function can be expressed explicitly as the function of conservative variables and their derivatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, the initial distribution function is given from the first‐order Chapman–Enskog (C‐E) expansion 23–26 . It is indeed the distribution function truncated to the NS level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%