2014 Seventh International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iscid.2014.217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Monte Carlo Localization Algorithm for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A framework can only be designed by combining all of the techniques that can serve for the different applications. Recent research on localization algorithms in WSNs has appeared in (Luan et al, 2014;Cao, 2011;Bianchi et al, 2018). Here, we highlight the more popular localization techniques and range-free algorithms of localization, including the mobile reference nodes.…”
Section: Localization Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A framework can only be designed by combining all of the techniques that can serve for the different applications. Recent research on localization algorithms in WSNs has appeared in (Luan et al, 2014;Cao, 2011;Bianchi et al, 2018). Here, we highlight the more popular localization techniques and range-free algorithms of localization, including the mobile reference nodes.…”
Section: Localization Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localization accuracy can be improved by combining SMC schemes and the genetic algorithm as in Genetic and Weighting Monte Carlo Localization (GWMCL) [83]. Crossover and mutation can be used to draw samples from a virtual anchor node.…”
Section: State-of-the-art Smc Localization Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Storing posterior location information of estimated location, velocity, direction, and motion type in the table needs more memory and can slow the localization process in SMCLA [78]. Another localization scheme is genetic algorithm implemented in SMC technique to filter out invalid samples [83]; the genetic algorithm requires large data and high execution time, so it is unsuitable for thin devices like sensor node.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Localization Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the MCB still has a large and fuzzy sampling point set, and there is also much room for improvement in the prediction of the motion direction of the node. In addition to the above improved strategies, there are many researches on the localization algorithm of wireless mobile sensor networks based on Monte Carlo localization algorithm, such as adaptive weight [14], virtual anchor node [15], model prediction [16], fusion posture estimation [17] etc. Aiming at the problem of MCB algorithm, this paper proposes an improved MCB for mobile sensor networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%