2018
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2018.1499050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved model for the tangential velocity distribution in strong free-surface vortices: an experimental and theoretical study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Otherwise, the aspect ratio between the diameter of the tank and the diameter of the outlet hole determines the diameter of the air vortex formed in the tank (Wanchat et al, 2013). However, the results of this study are similar to the study conducted by Mulligan et al, (2019) where they compare experimental results with data by analytical models. In this study, the error amounts to up to 30% between models and experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Otherwise, the aspect ratio between the diameter of the tank and the diameter of the outlet hole determines the diameter of the air vortex formed in the tank (Wanchat et al, 2013). However, the results of this study are similar to the study conducted by Mulligan et al, (2019) where they compare experimental results with data by analytical models. In this study, the error amounts to up to 30% between models and experimental data.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…By reviewing the literature, it was determined that the numerical results delivered by ANSYS were compared with the models proposed by Einstein & Li, (2011), Vatistas et al, (1986), Rosenhead, (1930), and Hite Jr & Mih, (1994 (Table 1). They were compared to each other and with the results of an experimental test in previous research (Mulligan et al, 2019). In addition, these models have a higher level of detail in their variables compared to unused studies.…”
Section: Numerical Vs Analytical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timilsina et al [5] provided a comprehensive overview of various theoretical, analytical, and empirical models that characterize and measure the vortex flow field, pressure, and tangential velocity and the interaction between vortex and turbine. Mulligan et al [116] indicated that a water vortex can be explained by the theory of conservation of angular momentum. Fluid particles moving radially and with a small inflow of tangential velocity generate a significant vortex structure close to the centre of the discharge.…”
Section: Vortex Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, numerous authors found significant discrepancies in this model near the vortex core region. Mulligan et al, (2018) studied the tangential velocity distribution extensively using particle tracking velocimetry and reported that this discrepancy was likely due to neglecting the axial flow effects in this region. To improve on this, Mulligan et al (2018) presented a corrected equation as follows:…”
Section: Vortex Chamber Velocity Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, undertook a study on twelve variations of the scroll chamber to develop a simple empirical model for determining the depth discharge based only on the approach flow geometry. Subsequently, Mulligan et al (2018) investigated the tangential velocity profiles across the scroll chamber using laser particle tracking velocimetry.…”
Section: Subcritical Intake Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%