Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258) 1999
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.1999.758108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved mixed excitation linear prediction (MELP) coder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pitch estimation algorithms are responsible for computation of the pitch period and classification of voiced and unvoiced frames. For this reason, we have chosen a strategy based upon the pitch detection algorithm introduced by Unno et al [7], which uses a sliding window to further reduce incorrect pitch values and voicing decisions. The deployment of a sliding window can reduce the artificial noise usually found in non-stationary segments that contain vowels and result in more accurate voicing decisions and pitch estimates.…”
Section: Pitch Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pitch estimation algorithms are responsible for computation of the pitch period and classification of voiced and unvoiced frames. For this reason, we have chosen a strategy based upon the pitch detection algorithm introduced by Unno et al [7], which uses a sliding window to further reduce incorrect pitch values and voicing decisions. The deployment of a sliding window can reduce the artificial noise usually found in non-stationary segments that contain vowels and result in more accurate voicing decisions and pitch estimates.…”
Section: Pitch Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods reported in [9] resemble those introduced in [7] and [8]. However, the overall scheme has novel contributions with respect to some specific points that differ from the techniques described in [7] and [8].…”
Section: Fricatives and Stops Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the detection of stop sounds we employ the peakiness value of the LPC residual signal r(n) and a sliding window is used to find the frame position that maximizes the peakiness value [6]. The peakiness value with the sliding window is given by wh P = re N is the frame size, and T, is the m rtimum sliding range that is also used in (1).…”
Section: Detection Of Fricatives and Stopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mixed noise and pulse excitation is not capable of reproducing specific signals such as those seen in stops and fricatives. In order to provide a clearer speech quality for the sentences containing stop and fricative sounds, we use an strategy based upon the algorithms introduced by Unno et al [6] and Ehnert 171. It envolves the detection and the modelling and synthesis of these signals.…”
Section: Sound Specific Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%