2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12639-013-0316-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved microculture method for diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis

Abstract: This study evaluated the performance of three diagnostic methods for cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). Patients who came to the Health Center Laboratory of Gonbad-e-Qabus in Golestan Province, Iran, were enrolled in the study. Skin scraping smear, improved microculture (IMC) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were performed. A total of 303 subjects were recruited, among whom 273 subjects fulfilled the criteria for CL. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.8 % (95 % CI = 84.2-92.2 %) and 100.0 % for smears, 98.4 % (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cutaneous leishmaniasis individuals were considered for enrolment if they presented with active skin lesions of recent onset of infection. Samples were obtained by lesion scrapping using a vaccinostyle, under sterile conditions; moreover, the laboratory confirmation of CL patients was done through direct microscopy on Giemsa staining lesion smears, lesion aspirate microculture and PCR‐RFLP/nested PCR . The personal information of each CL confirmed patient was recorded (sex, age, lesion duration, type and number, and drug consumption) (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cutaneous leishmaniasis individuals were considered for enrolment if they presented with active skin lesions of recent onset of infection. Samples were obtained by lesion scrapping using a vaccinostyle, under sterile conditions; moreover, the laboratory confirmation of CL patients was done through direct microscopy on Giemsa staining lesion smears, lesion aspirate microculture and PCR‐RFLP/nested PCR . The personal information of each CL confirmed patient was recorded (sex, age, lesion duration, type and number, and drug consumption) (Table ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, the performance of micro-culture was assessed on 273 subjects who fulfilled the criteria for CL. Sensitivity and specificity for micro-culture were 98.4 % (95 % CI = 96.1–99.1 %) and 100.0 %, respectively [ 14 ]. Additional advantages of this method are simplicity and the fact that diagnostic samples are retrieved by a needle-free method.…”
Section: Laboratory Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A drawback of micro-culture is that this technique does not allow for further species determination [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%