1988
DOI: 10.1109/8.1073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved MFIE formulation for TE-wave scattering from lossy, inhomogeneous dielectric cylinders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, even though the new integral equations (12) % and (14) have half the unknowns, this was not achieved at the expense of increasing the kernel's singularity or the order of the expansion basis required in their implementation. It is remarked that special forms of these integral equations have already been successfully implemented for two dimensional applications [11,12].…”
Section: Volume Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, even though the new integral equations (12) % and (14) have half the unknowns, this was not achieved at the expense of increasing the kernel's singularity or the order of the expansion basis required in their implementation. It is remarked that special forms of these integral equations have already been successfully implemented for two dimensional applications [11,12].…”
Section: Volume Representationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it rapidly appeared that this kind of approximation is not efficient and that it leads to the presence of spurious surface charge densities inside the scatterer [8]. To circumvent this problem, numerical techniques have been developed using the so-called rooftop functions on cells of various shapes [11]- [14]. More recently, to still enhance the accuracy of the MoM, the use of isoparametric elements has been proposed [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the DIE method (both TM and TE versions of it) has been around in engineering community for many years [16,17,18,19,21,22,25,27,28], the full theoretical analysis of the two-dimensional case (in the strongly singular form) is still missing. The reason might be the presence of special functions in the kernel of the integral operator, which makes calculations more tedious than in the threedimensional case [4,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If an object is large and homogeneous or has a perfectly conducting boundary then the problem is usually reduced to a boundary integral equation with the fields (currents) at the interfaces being the fundamental unknowns [13]. If an object is continuously inhomogeneous or is a composite consisting of many small different parts, the most appropriate global method is the domain integral equation (DIE), in two dimensions, or the volume integral equation, in three dimensions [16,17,18,19,21,22,25,27,28]. Although the global methods produce dense matrices, they are generally more stable with respect to discretization than the local ones, and the convolution-type integral operators sometimes allow to compute matrix-vector products at the FFT speed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%