2020
DOI: 10.1080/15567036.2020.1800140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved method in petrophysical rock typing based on mercury-injection capillary pressure data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figures 4-6, increasing the injection As shown in Figure 9, the oil recovery factors obtained from experiments on core C (Tor formation) have higher MFZI in comparison with core B (Ekofisk formation). Thus, core C from the Tor formation belongs to a different rock type than core B according to standard FZI-based rock type analysis [62,63]. This shows that higher MFZI can attribute in higher recovery factors for experiments on core plug C. It can be seen in this plot that the recovery factors for SW injection lie under the linear trend passing the recovery factors for FW, whereas the recovery factors for DSW lie above this trend line.…”
Section: Capillary End Effectmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As shown in Figures 4-6, increasing the injection As shown in Figure 9, the oil recovery factors obtained from experiments on core C (Tor formation) have higher MFZI in comparison with core B (Ekofisk formation). Thus, core C from the Tor formation belongs to a different rock type than core B according to standard FZI-based rock type analysis [62,63]. This shows that higher MFZI can attribute in higher recovery factors for experiments on core plug C. It can be seen in this plot that the recovery factors for SW injection lie under the linear trend passing the recovery factors for FW, whereas the recovery factors for DSW lie above this trend line.…”
Section: Capillary End Effectmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In recent years, many researchers have investigated the methods for reservoir classification based on the NMR T 2 distribution. The main idea of reservoir classification methods based on NMR logging is to convert the NMR T 2 distribution to capillary pressure curves based on HPMI experiments and, thereby, obtain the pore structure parameters (e.g., displacement pressure and median radius) for pore structure evaluation and reservoir classification. On the basis of the correlation between the NMR T 2 distribution and pore-throat size distribution, a method for pore structure identification was established, where NMR was used to investigate the characteristics of pore structures . This method provides a basis for the evaluation of tight sandstone reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, with the development of new exploration technologies, unconventional reservoirs have become the research focus in the field of petroleum exploration. Conventional methods are no longer applicable to the evaluation of unconventional reservoirs, like sandstone reservoirs. Therefore, to improve the evaluation of unconventional reservoirs, it is necessary to quantitatively characterize their pore structures. Because pore structure parameters are obtained using mercury injection capillary pressure (MICP) curves, based on which the type of reservoir can be determined, the accurate determination of MICP curves is of great importance. Currently, MICP curves are generally obtained through MICP experiments. However, in actual exploration, it is difficult to obtain a large number of core samples, which are then destroyed by mercury injection measurements. , Therefore, non-destructive methods by which to continuously obtain reservoir MICP curves for reservoir evaluation have become a key subject of oil and gas exploration. , …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%