1988
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1176(88)83016-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved method for the high-precision isotopic measurement of boron by thermal ionization mass spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
69
0
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A severe limitation of that method, however, is the strong dependence of the reproducibility on parameters such as size, purity, Na/B ratio and preparation procedures of samples (Xiao et al, 1988). The cesium-metaborate method developed by Spivack and Edmond (1986) and Ramakumar et al (1985) has an analytical uncertainty of about _+0.1-0.4%o (e.g., Spivack and Edmond, 1986;1987;Palmer et al, 1987;Xiao et al, 1988;Palmer and Slack, 1989;Palmer, 1991a;1991b;Palmer and Sturchio, 1990;Palmer et al, 1992;Leeman et al, 1991;Nakamura et al, 1992). The higher precision of the cesium-metaborate method compared to the sodium-metaborate method is due to the higher molecular mass of Cs2BO~ and thus to the considerably smaller relative mass difference of its isotopic species, which limits thermally induced mass-dependent isotopic fractionation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A severe limitation of that method, however, is the strong dependence of the reproducibility on parameters such as size, purity, Na/B ratio and preparation procedures of samples (Xiao et al, 1988). The cesium-metaborate method developed by Spivack and Edmond (1986) and Ramakumar et al (1985) has an analytical uncertainty of about _+0.1-0.4%o (e.g., Spivack and Edmond, 1986;1987;Palmer et al, 1987;Xiao et al, 1988;Palmer and Slack, 1989;Palmer, 1991a;1991b;Palmer and Sturchio, 1990;Palmer et al, 1992;Leeman et al, 1991;Nakamura et al, 1992). The higher precision of the cesium-metaborate method compared to the sodium-metaborate method is due to the higher molecular mass of Cs2BO~ and thus to the considerably smaller relative mass difference of its isotopic species, which limits thermally induced mass-dependent isotopic fractionation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PTIMS method, however, is time-consuming, 15,16 and is generally subject to isobaric interference of Cs 2 CNO + on Cs 2 BO 2 + , in which some additional processes should be employed 17,18 or careful monitoring 4 is necessary to diminish isobaric interference and to achieve good precision for boron isotope. In contrast, the MC-ICP-MS method is less timeconsuming and free from isobaric interference from organic matters.…”
Section: -11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The external precision of the azomethine-H method used here was 2 %. The isotopic compositions of boron in all samples were measured by a GV IsoProbe T single magnetic sector thermal ionization mass spectrometer and the P-TIMS method using Cs 2 BO + 2 ions with a graphite loading (Xiao et al, 1988). Two µl of graphite slurry was first loaded onto a degassed tantalum filament, and then approximately 1 µl of sample solution containing about 1-4 µg of boron and an equimolar amount of mannitol were also loaded.…”
Section: Measurements Of Boron Concentration and Isotopic Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%