2007
DOI: 10.1007/s12033-007-0015-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved method for single step purification of metagenomic DNA

Abstract: An improved method for purification of intact metagenomic DNA from soil has been developed using Q-Sepharose, which purified the DNA from phenolic and humic acid contaminants in a single step. The entire procedure for purification took only 45 min. A total of 81% of DNA was recovered after purification and there was 84% reduction in humic acid contents. The purified DNA was readily digested with restriction enzymes and can be further used for molecular applications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolation of metagenomic DNA Total DNA was extracted from the three samples according to the method of Sharma et al (2007) with minor modifications.…”
Section: Molecular Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation of metagenomic DNA Total DNA was extracted from the three samples according to the method of Sharma et al (2007) with minor modifications.…”
Section: Molecular Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid nitrogen is most commonly used for homogenization (Wu et al, 2001). Some researchers used dry ice (Griffin et al, 2002), SDS lysis (Syn and Swarup, 2000), high-speed cell disruption (Muller et al, 1998) and glass bead/magnetic bead-vortexing/SDS lysis (Sambrook and Russel, 2001;Faggi et al, 2005), lysozyme lysis/enzyme digestion (Flamm et al, 1984a,b;Li et al, 2002), benzyl chloride lysis (Xue et al, 2006), sonication (Sharma et al, 2007), microwave exposure (Goodwin and Lee, 1993) and combinations of different methods (Zhang et al, 2008). In each method, the major objective lies with elimination of PCR inhibitors (metallic cations, polysaccharide, polyphenols, and other secondary metabolites) in DNA samples which would otherwise prevent DNA amplification.…”
Section: Fungal Dna Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sonification method: The ultra sonic waves can easily destroy the cell wall (Voget et al, 2003, Sharma et al, 2007. However, it is less used for extraction of DNA than other cellular components such as proteins and pigments.…”
Section: Fungal Dna Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total DNA extraction from samples DNA from the complex samples was extracted and purified according to described methods with some modifications [45]. Samples (0.5 g) were extracted with 1.3 mL extraction buffer (100 mM Tris-Cl pH 8.0, 100 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 1.5 M NaCl, 100 mM sodium phosphate pH 8.0, 1% CTAB).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%