“…In addition to the physical, chemical, and biological processes that induce MDF (reported as δ 202 Hg), Hg MIF signatures, reported as Δ 199 Hg and Δ 201 Hg for odd-MIF and Δ 200 Hg for even-MIF, may specifically trace reactions and determine the contribution of distinct endmembers. For example, in forest ecosystems, Hg II in precipitation shows predominantly positive odd-MIF and even-MIF and negative values in MDF. − Soil and forest biomasses display primarily negative odd-MIF and MDF, and insignificant even-MIF, ,,− while atmospheric Hg 0 vapor shows negative odd-MIF, positive MDF, and slightly negative even-MIF (only around −0.05‰ in remote sites). ,− Given the anthropogenic emissions and biomass burning, the atmosphere in Southeast Asia showed the slightly more positive in odd-MIF , (Δ 199 Hg = −0.13 ± 0.08‰ and Δ 201 Hg = −0.12 ± 0.08‰ − ) and comparable even-MIF (Δ 200 Hg = −0.04 ± 0.04‰) compared to other remote sites (Δ 199 Hg = −0.20 ± 0.08‰, Δ 201 Hg = −0.17 ± 0.10‰ and Δ 200 Hg = −0.06 ± 0.04‰ ,− , ). Furthermore, most physico-chemical processes preferentially remove lighter Hg isotopes and result in the heavier isotopes remaining in the residual. ,, While microbial reduction does not significantly affect odd-MIF, , abiotic oxidation by natural organic matter (NOM) in the dark gives a positive shift in odd-MIF of the residual pool of Hg 0 . , Moreover, abiotic dark reduction and organosulfur-mediated photoreduction produce a positive odd-MIF shift in the product Hg 0 , albeit the MIF is induced through different mechanisms, , whereas the organic matter-mediated photoreduction driven preferentially by O-donor groups cause a negative odd-MIF shift in the product Hg 0 . , …”