2021 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/cibcb49929.2021.9562947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Method for Finding Attractors of Large-Scale Asynchronous Boolean Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides performance improvements, it is possible to extend our framework to apply the new GRN decomposition 19,34 and sample strategies to scale for larger values of n$$ n $$. Furthermore, the integration of the accelerator with Amazon AWS cloud services offers the possibility to incorporate it in software applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides performance improvements, it is possible to extend our framework to apply the new GRN decomposition 19,34 and sample strategies to scale for larger values of n$$ n $$. Furthermore, the integration of the accelerator with Amazon AWS cloud services offers the possibility to incorporate it in software applications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it requires efficient software and hardware implementations. Second, recent GRN decomposition strategies 19,34 should be applied to handle large networks (greater than 20 nodes). Third, efficient sample approaches reduce the solution space.…”
Section: Derrida Plotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, much of the Boolean network design and analysis has been performed either manually, or through computer assisted approaches requiring extensive involvement of domain experts [2][3][4] . However, recent developments in topics like attractor [5][6][7] and trap space 8 detection, bifurcation analysis 9 , and synthesis from data and prior knowledge 10,11 enable comprehensive automated analysis of large, possibly partially unknown networks comprising hundreds of components. This proliferation of Boolean network tools and methods motivates the need for extensive and reproducible validation using realistic real-world models.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an efficient method called iFVS-ABN [17] has been proposed for exactly computing all the attractors of an ABN. iFVS-ABN first computes a Negative Feedback Vertex Set (NFVS) of the interaction graph of the ABN that is a signed directed graph that expresses the effects (positive or negative) among the nodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach of iFVS-ABN seems to be very promising and its prototype implementation significantly outperforms the previous methods including genYsis [12], CABEAN [26], and FVS-ABN [46] (the predecessor of iFVS-ABN). However, the crucial issue of iFVS-ABN is that it still must perform the reachability analysis in most cases [17]. Since the reachability in ABNs is PSPACE-complete [9] and there is no reachability analysis method that is robustly efficient for large models [17], the issue may drastically reduce the efficiency of iFVS-ABN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%