2015
DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved method for evaluating ideal standards in self‐perception and mate preferences

Abstract: The aim of the study was to improve the methodology for measuring ideals of self-perception and mate preferences. The Ideal Standards Model (ISM; Fletcher, Simpson, Thomas & Giles, 1999) was used as a basis for development of the scale. It was further modified by adding a number of items from previous studies. Data were collected from 223 participants, aged 19 to 27 years. The results suggested that a modified five-factor version of the ISM is an appropriate method for evaluation of ideal characteristics. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideal standards reflect one's hopes and expectations for a romantic partner, and are comprised of three factors: warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, and status-resources (Fletcher et al, 1999;and similarly, Csajbók & Berkics, 2017;Katsena & Dimdins, 2015).…”
Section: Ideal Standards Flexibility and Self-perceived Mate Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideal standards reflect one's hopes and expectations for a romantic partner, and are comprised of three factors: warmth-trustworthiness, vitality-attractiveness, and status-resources (Fletcher et al, 1999;and similarly, Csajbók & Berkics, 2017;Katsena & Dimdins, 2015).…”
Section: Ideal Standards Flexibility and Self-perceived Mate Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All participants were aged 16–40 years. This is typical of the age groups recruited for attractiveness and sexuality studies (Bale and Archer 2013; Katsena and Dimdins 2015; Wincenciak et al . 2015; Rojas et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…All participants were aged 16-40 years. This is typical of the age groups recruited for attractiveness and sexuality studies (Bale and Archer 2013;Katsena and Dimdins 2015;Wincenciak et al 2015;Rojas et al 2016). Those without ID were recruited from a range of college courses, including police services, politics, history and social sciences.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%