2020
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-13-4459-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved mechanistic model for ammonia volatilization in Earth system models: Flow of Agricultural Nitrogen version 2 (FANv2)

Abstract: Abstract. Volatilization of ammonia (NH3) from fertilizers and livestock wastes forms a significant pathway of nitrogen losses in agricultural ecosystems and constitutes the largest source of atmospheric emissions of NH3. This paper describes a major update to the process model FAN (Flow of Agricultural Nitrogen), which evaluates NH3 emissions interactively within an Earth system model; in this work, the Community Earth System Model (CESM) is used. The updated version (FANv2) includes a more detailed treatment… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 114 publications
(166 reference statements)
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing manure application (e.g., Riddick et al, 2016) is also expected to increase yields prior to 1950, although changes in the aerial application rate are not represented in CLM5. More robust manure application schemes are under development (Vira et al, 2019). Corn, wheat, and rice yields increased most with fertilizer application, whereas nitrogen‐fixing soybean yields, as expected, did not change much with fertilizer application (Figure S8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing manure application (e.g., Riddick et al, 2016) is also expected to increase yields prior to 1950, although changes in the aerial application rate are not represented in CLM5. More robust manure application schemes are under development (Vira et al, 2019). Corn, wheat, and rice yields increased most with fertilizer application, whereas nitrogen‐fixing soybean yields, as expected, did not change much with fertilizer application (Figure S8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Industrial fertilizer is prescribed by crop type, year, and country based on LUH2 fertilization rates (Hurtt et al, 2011). More realistic development of manure application, including transient application rates and N fluxes, is under development (Riddick et al, 2016; Vira et al, 2019) but not included in the released version of CLM5. The application of irrigation water is limited to only the irrigated crop columns.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The records of the other seven crops are available since the 1980s. To extend the crop-specific planting date records back to 1900, we adopted the approach used in the Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC) crop model (Williams et al, 1989), which considers daily heat unit accumulation (HU, Eq. 4) and heat unit index (HUI, Eq.…”
Section: Crop Phenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess the abatement potentials of NH 3 emissions, it is prerequisite to identify the volatilization rates (VRs) associated with diverse farming systems and fertilization practices. However, the quantification of VR (i.e., NH 3 -N emission per unit of N fertilizers applied) and relevant emissions remains highly uncertain, primarily attributable to the episodic nature of NH 3 volatilization and the highly spatial variability of agricultural practices 1,2,[18][19][20][21] . For example, estimates of global cropland-NH 3 volatilization from synthetic fertilizer application by various bottom-up approaches 2,18,19,21 ranged from 9 to 14 Tg N (Table S1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, estimates of global cropland-NH 3 volatilization from synthetic fertilizer application by various bottom-up approaches 2,18,19,21 ranged from 9 to 14 Tg N (Table S1). Such differences were as large as almost two times within the major emitting countries (e.g., China 18,22 , Pakistan 19,23 , USA 2,21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%