2017
DOI: 10.1177/1525822x17726726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Measure of Cognitive Salience in Free Listing Tasks

Abstract: A new free-list measure of cognitive salience, B 0 , is presented, which includes both list position and list frequency. It surpasses other extant measures by being normed to vary between a maximum of 1 and a minimum of 0, thereby making it useful for comparisons irrespective of list length or number of respondents. An illustration of its properties, uses, and computation is provided with the aid of examples drawn from free lists of foods elicited from a sample of migrants from the Republic of the Marshall Isl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cognitive salience (CS) [ 8 ] and use value (UV) [ 9 ] were applied to determine the greatest cognitive and cultural importance of these medical plants in Jianghua.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cognitive salience (CS) [ 8 ] and use value (UV) [ 9 ] were applied to determine the greatest cognitive and cultural importance of these medical plants in Jianghua.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interviewers collected traditional knowledge from large samples of free-lists which reveal cognitive salience from individuals’ local knowledge. The measure of cognitive salience includes both list position and list frequency irrespective of list length or number of respondents [ 8 , 12 ]. We interviewed 215 informants and recorded 215 free-lists; here, we calculated the mean cognitive salience (CS) for each listed species, …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salient terms are also more prevalent in everyday language [ 10 – 12 ]. Item salience also may be estimated by combining an item’s frequency across lists with its rank/position on individual lists [ 13 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the analysis we propose is applicable to the interpretation of the salience calculated by any other formula (e.g. Sutrop 2001;Robbins et al 2017) or even for free-recall studies.…”
Section: Final Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Smith (1993) proposed the joint use of these two variables in the Salience Index. The Salience Index has since been adjusted by Smith & Borgatti (1997) and Smith et al (1995), while other versions were proposed by Sutrop (2001) and Robbins et al (2017), although maintaining the basic idea of combining the average position and frequency of citation of each item in determining the relative importance of items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%