2021
DOI: 10.1002/suco.202100450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved Lubliner strength model based on Ottosen failure criterion for concrete under multiaxial stress state

Abstract: The Lubliner strength criterion (SC) can achieve desirable responses in the tension‐dominated and plane compressive stress states but overestimates the concrete strength under triaxial compression. Moreover, additional breakpoints without continuous derivatives occur along the hydrostatic pressure axis. The primary causes for these problems include the Lubliner SC constant γ parameter and breakpoints along the piecewise linear meridians. Therefore, a new Lubliner–Ottosen SC is developed with the parameter γ de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(134 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the eccentricity (ϵ), ratio of the compressive strength under biaxial loading to uniaxial (f b0 =f c0 ), and the shape factor (K c ) the default values, 0.1, 1.16, and 0.667, respectively, as selected by past researchers were considered. [49][50][51][52][53][54] In CDP model, the compressive behavior of concrete can be defined in tabulated form. It consists of stress (σ c ), inelastic strain (ε in c ) corresponding to stress value, and damage parameter (d c ).…”
Section: Unconfined Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the eccentricity (ϵ), ratio of the compressive strength under biaxial loading to uniaxial (f b0 =f c0 ), and the shape factor (K c ) the default values, 0.1, 1.16, and 0.667, respectively, as selected by past researchers were considered. [49][50][51][52][53][54] In CDP model, the compressive behavior of concrete can be defined in tabulated form. It consists of stress (σ c ), inelastic strain (ε in c ) corresponding to stress value, and damage parameter (d c ).…”
Section: Unconfined Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ψ=33 and μ=0.0015, the model predicted the behavior with good accuracy and reasonable computation time. For the eccentricity (ϵ), ratio of the compressive strength under biaxial loading to uniaxial (fb0/fc0), and the shape factor ( K c ) the default values, 0.1, 1.16, and 0.667, respectively, as selected by past researchers were considered 49–54 …”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%