2020
DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3037112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Loss-Separation Method for Transformer Core Loss Calculation and Its Experimental Verification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The core loss model is based on the Bertotti's separation of losses technique [100], which is expressed by Equation (13).…”
Section: Core Loss In C-core Magnetic Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The core loss model is based on the Bertotti's separation of losses technique [100], which is expressed by Equation (13).…”
Section: Core Loss In C-core Magnetic Circuitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each of the studies mentioned above, it was necessary to model the magnetic circuit of the device under analysis. However, this process can be challenging if there is a lack of data, for instance, when the electric steel characteristics are unknown and there is no access to sophisticated equipment for material characterization tests [20], [21]. In addition, occasionally, it is necessary to model devices in operation, where the characteristics of its electric steel sheets may vary due to thermal stress, steel sheets aging [22] or even because of mechanical stress during its assembly or transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its origin is often explained with Bertotti's theory, also known as loss separation, where the excess loss is related with the domain structure of magnetic material [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9]]. Bertotti's approach is still a field of extensive research, including its validation for new types of soft magnetic materials as well as for non-sinusoidal excitations [10][11][12][13]. However, it should be remembered that the classical formulas do not take into consideration the dynamics of domain structure (movement of domain walls, creation and annihilation of domains), i.e., they neglect the microscopic eddy currents caused by magnetic flux changes near domain walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%