1999
DOI: 10.1109/60.815078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved iron loss estimation for permanent magnet brushless machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A return of investment table is made taking into account the widely used and locally accessible core materials. It is based on estimated core losses via an analytical model [10], and investment costs of various electrical steel types. The results are presented in Table II according to amortization duration in months.…”
Section: Sariyar (1956)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A return of investment table is made taking into account the widely used and locally accessible core materials. It is based on estimated core losses via an analytical model [10], and investment costs of various electrical steel types. The results are presented in Table II according to amortization duration in months.…”
Section: Sariyar (1956)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) Core Loss: Core loss is calculated via the methodology presented in [10]. Formulas are developed to estimate the hysteresis and eddy current losses in the stator teeth and yoke.…”
Section: E Loss Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the magnetic flux variation due to the rotation of magnets generates eddy and hysteresis losses in laminations. These losses are estimated individually for stator teeth and yoke as the field variations in them are different [9]. The loss per unit mass due to hysteresis (P h ), eddy current in stator yoke (P ey ) and eddy current in stator tooth (P et ) are calculated as [9] (3) (4) (5) where f is the frequency of flux variation, B m is the peak flux density, α tt and β m are the tooth arc and the pole width respectively in electrical radians, K h , K e , α and β are the curve fit constants calculated from the loss data of the laminations.…”
Section: Losses In Pmbldc Motormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bertotti three-term equation Eq. (3.3) [52] is a classic method to estimate the specific iron loss, P Spec [W/kg], in laminations with sinusoidal flux density variation. It describes P Spec by three terms that represents hysteresis losses, eddy current losses and excessive losses.…”
Section: Iron Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.3) describes P Spec in terms of a sinusoidal variation in B, the accuracy will decrease when the B-waveforms deviates from a perfect sinusoid. In this case, [52] further presents the generalised equation, Eq. (3.4), that yields a more accurate result.…”
Section: Iron Lossesmentioning
confidence: 99%