2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved interfacial bonding model for material interface modeling

Abstract: An improved interfacial bonding model was proposed from potential function point of view to investigate interfacial interactions in polycrystalline materials. It characterizes both attractive and repulsive interfacial interactions and can be applied to model different material interfaces. The path dependence of work-of-separation study indicates that the transformation of separation work is smooth in normal and tangential direction and the proposed model guarantees the consistency of the cohesive constitutive … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). Based on the previous convergence test of similar models (Lin et al, 2017; Lin et al, 2016), the mesh size in current work is around 150nm and the time step is Δ t = l× 10 −10 s. We have plotted the stress-strain curves after calculations, the stress-strain curves in the early post yield state agreed well with experimental measurements as shown in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…5). Based on the previous convergence test of similar models (Lin et al, 2017; Lin et al, 2016), the mesh size in current work is around 150nm and the time step is Δ t = l× 10 −10 s. We have plotted the stress-strain curves after calculations, the stress-strain curves in the early post yield state agreed well with experimental measurements as shown in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The interfacial zone is widely used to study composite material failure process [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. The proposed interfacial zone model provides a numerical tool to study material response through defining different material interface behaviors [35,36]. Figure 2 shows the traction-separation relations in surface normal and tangential directions, which were used to govern the interfacial behaviors.…”
Section: Interfacial Zone Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have developed cohesive zone models to simulate material interface behaviour at different length scales in bone [9,[36][37][38][39]. For example, Lin et al [36] recently defined a cohesive zone model to define the mechanical behaviour at the nanoscale of the extrafibrillar matrix in bone, the interfacial interactions in a simplified hexagonal-based model under compression loading [36]. On the other hand, Cox and Yang [39] formulated a cohesive fracture model and applied it to human femoral cortical bone data.…”
Section: At Different Scales)mentioning
confidence: 99%