2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved high-order scheme for DNS of low Mach number turbulent reacting flows based on stiff chemistry solver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations were performed using a simplified in-house DNS solver [30] developed for low-Mach-number reacting flows and equipped with a standalone stiff chemistry solver for a general kinetic mechanism. The solver was already applied to various reacting flow systems [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Simulation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations were performed using a simplified in-house DNS solver [30] developed for low-Mach-number reacting flows and equipped with a standalone stiff chemistry solver for a general kinetic mechanism. The solver was already applied to various reacting flow systems [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Numerical Methods and Simulation Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lagging errors introduced by the operator splitting treatment are unimportant for steady-state configurations, but may be substantial in some circumstances, for instance in the proximity of unsteady premixed flame fronts [3,33], and become more severe when running with larger time step sizes. The effects of these errors have been the subject of many previous studies [33][34][35][36][37], and have been found to be case-dependent. Note that, with the application of these techniques, the resulting Ordinary Differential Equations (ODE) associated with the chemistry (instead of the coupled PDEs) remain stiff.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To alleviate the high computational overhead associated with the integration of these stiff ODEs, methods relying on implicit numerical schemes based on Backward-Differentiation Formulas (BDF) have been developed [38,39] and implemented in packages such as VODE [40] and DASSL [41,42]. These packages integrate stiff chemical kinetics using BDFs with a modified iterative Newton procedure [41][42][43][44], and have been widely adopted in numerical simulations of chemically reacting flows [3,33,34]. Despite the significant computational efficiency gain brought by the stiff chemistry integration techniques discussed above, it is important to recall that these techniques are designed for time-dependent ODE systems (and not PDE), which arise from the application of time-splitting techniques to separate the reactive (chemical kinetic) part of the PDE system (species transport equations) from the convective-diffusive part [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details of the governing equations solved and the numerical methods are described in Ref. [13], where evaluations of the numerical solver are provided. A short description of the numerical method is given below, focusing on key features of the solver and new implementations of the method accounting for the compression effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original DNS solver was designed for constant volume domain simulation based on fixed grid [13]. To account for the pressure rise due to piston motion while still based on the constant volume domain framework, the original conservation equations are modified by employing a temporally evolving but spatially uniform source term.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%