2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2009.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved height function technique for computing interface curvature from volume fractions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figure also includes the average number of times the α coefficients of Eqs. (16) and (17) are calculated, N α , when the proposed CIBRAVE method of Section 4 ( Fig. 11(b)) is used (obviously, only one calculation of the α coefficients is required when the standard method of Fig.…”
Section: Interface Reconstruction In Single Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The figure also includes the average number of times the α coefficients of Eqs. (16) and (17) are calculated, N α , when the proposed CIBRAVE method of Section 4 ( Fig. 11(b)) is used (obviously, only one calculation of the α coefficients is required when the standard method of Fig.…”
Section: Interface Reconstruction In Single Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 and 16 show, for different cell geometries, the partial CPU times corresponding to the construction of the list of ordered vertices, the bracketing procedure, the calculation of the α coefficients of Eq. (16) or (17), and the root finding step. The sums of the partial relative CPU times are also included in the figures.…”
Section: Interface Reconstruction In Single Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid approach was introduced by Williams [10], using the first derivative of a convolution kernel to evaluate the interface normals and a finite-difference method to calculate the curvature from the interface normals. Recent efforts to find more accurate ways to determine the interface curvature have mainly focused on VOF methods with height functions (HF) [6,9,[12][13][14][15] and coupled VOF-LS methods [16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Nomenclaturẽmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the proposed least-squares method to evaluate the interface curvature, CELESTE, an inviscid static drop in equilibrium as found in [6,11,13,14] is considered. The inviscid static drop is the same as applied in Section 4.1.1.…”
Section: Inviscid Static Drop In Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the literature (Francois et al, 2006;Liovic et al, 2010;López et al, 2009) doesn't adopt this criterion and reports the spurious velocity magnitude only for the initial time steps. For the present test case, simulations are run up to t/T v = 1 and Fig.…”
Section: Stationary Dropletmentioning
confidence: 99%