2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved general variable neighborhood search for a static bike-sharing rebalancing problem considering the depot inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction between pedestrians and e-bicycles in bicycle lanes or pedestrian areas can be a crucial challenge in the process of implementing e-bicycles owing to their high speed. Moreover, the operational costs of a bicycle and e-bicycle sharing system can significantly fluctuate depending on various factors, including population density, the size of the service area, and the location and capacity of stations [44], all of which are added challenging and determining factors in the daily use of cycling innovations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between pedestrians and e-bicycles in bicycle lanes or pedestrian areas can be a crucial challenge in the process of implementing e-bicycles owing to their high speed. Moreover, the operational costs of a bicycle and e-bicycle sharing system can significantly fluctuate depending on various factors, including population density, the size of the service area, and the location and capacity of stations [44], all of which are added challenging and determining factors in the daily use of cycling innovations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A static strategy relocates bikes at routine times or when both traffic and demand are low, e.g., during night time, whereas a dynamic one works once a station is going to be unavailable, i.e., full or empty station. Obviously, the static repositioning is hardly content with frequent rental and return demands; however, it can be modeled as optimization problems whose objective is to route trunks of finite capacity to meet station targets while minimizing the route length [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with other modes of transportation, the operation and planning of public BSS in metropolitan areas are hindered by unique challenges. First, the demand is unevenly distributed both geographically and temporally, with stations in residence and office areas being either frequently full or empty during peak hours, thus preventing local check-ins and check-outs and consequently hampering user trust [12,27]. Second, bike sharing demand is affected by significant externalities, including daily variations on the users' profile and endeavors impacting their preference towards a given mode of mobility [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, bike sharing demand is affected by significant externalities, including daily variations on the users' profile and endeavors impacting their preference towards a given mode of mobility [17]. Balancing initiatives, including the ongoing bike relocation or dynamic user incentives for taking specific routes along certain time windows can be placed to counter-act this effect [27]. Yet, their efficacy is largely dependent on the ability to model and forecast the demand of BSS stations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%