An improved gas–liquid–solid coupling model with plastic failure for hydraulic flushing in gassy coal seam and application in borehole arrangement

Abstract

Hydraulic flushing can increase the efficiency of gas extraction by artificially modifying the coal reservoir. Considering the plastic failure of coal mass, an improved gas–liquid–solid coupling model for hydraulic flushing and gas extraction is constructed. The parameter evolution in the hydraulic flushing process was numerically investigated to determine the optimal borehole arrangement of hydraulic flushing. The results show that the relative permeability of gas gradually increases with the initial dewatering. The gas rates of both regular extraction and hydraulic flushing enhanced extraction show an increasing–decreasing trend. An increased and delayed peak gas rate is observed comparing with the regular extraction, caused by the hydraulic flushing induced new fractures. The area around of borehole is divided into the failure zone, the plastic softening zone, and the elastic zone after hydraulic flushing. The failure zone has the greatest increase in coal permeability, followed by the plastic softening zone, while the elastic zone keeps no significant change. The larger difference between the horizontal stress and vertical stress, the more obvious the elliptical shape of the permeability change area near the borehole, as well as the pressure drop in the elliptical zone. With the increase in the hydraulic flushing radius, the permeability increasing zone and gas pressure decreasing zone gradually increase. Subsequently, the equivalent effective radius and equivalent influencing radius were obtained, as well as the optimal borehole spacing for hydraulic flushing by cross-layer drilling. Finally, the optimal borehole spacing is obtained for different borehole diameters and efficient extraction times. These provide a theoretical guidance for field application of hydraulic flushing in a low-permeable coal seam.

Current Status of Research on the Coal and Gas Outburst Control Technology of Hydration and Anhydrous

“…Through this process, the surrounding coal body is radially displaced under the action of ground stress and gas pressure; the stress distribution around the borehole changes, cracks are formed, and the permeability of the coal seam increases. In addition, the coal around the borehole is wetted, its elasticity decreases, and its plasticity increases, which effectively increases the length of the overpressure relief zone at the working face and reduces the coal and gas outburst potential of the coal seam . Through extraction, the coal seam gas pressure and gas content can be effectively reduced to achieve the purpose of preventing and controlling coal and gas outbursts.…”

Scale Effect of Coal Porosity and Permeability Characteristics Based on CT 3D Reconstruction from a Microperspective

“…By comparing the difference in the permeability between coal samples at the laboratory scale and at the engineering scale, scholars draw the conclusion that the permeability difference between these two scales is 2–4 orders of magnitude. At the same time, the loading and unloading experiments were conducted under certain confining pressure to explore the sensitivity of the permeability to the confining pressure, and the relationship curve between the permeability and the stress under mining stress was drawn. , Wen studied the effect of particle size on acoustic emission characteristics of coal and rock under the size effect . Poulsen conducted a numerical study on the size effect of coal and rock strength and obtained the failure modes of coal and rock at different scales .…”

Experimental Investigations on Enhanced Coal Seam Methane Extraction by Injecting Gas: A Review

“…Traditional negative pressure gas drainage method has been unable to meet the requirements of safe and efficient gas drainage . In order to solve the problems of low permeability and high gas content in the coal seam faced by coal mining due to the increase of mining depth and scale, numerous scholars have carried out deep hole presplit blasting, force slot-cutting or punching, and other technologies − to improve the permeability of the coal seam. However, the process of presplit blasting pressure relief and permeability enhancement is not safe enough .…”