2009
DOI: 10.1515/znb-2009-11-1204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Gas Electron Diffractometer – The Instrument, Data Collection, Reduction and Structure Refinement Procedures

Abstract: The complex [Cu(en) 2 (H 2 O)](sy) 2 (en)(H 2 O) 2 has been synthesized and characterized by its electronic and vibrational spectra. The molecular structure of the complex has been determined by X-ray diffraction methods. The complex crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pnma with unit-cell parameters a = 10.7236 (5), b = 20.4660(10), c = 14.4523(11)Å and Z = 4. In the cation, the Cu(II) ion has a distorted square pyramidal coordination with two bidendate (en) ligands forming the basal plane and a H 2 O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data were reduced to total intensities by using the program PIMAG by Strand et al [35] (version 040827) and further data reduction (yielding molecular intensity curves), the molecular structure refinement, and the electron wavelength determination (from benzene data) were performed by using version 3.0 of the ed@ed program. [36] Further details about the Bielefeld GED apparatus, the data handling, and approaches to the refinement are given in reference [37]. Full information relating to the refinement is provided in the Supporting Information: The data analysis parameters for each data set (R factors, scale factors, data ranges, weighting points, nozzle-to-plate distances, and electron wavelengths), a list of interatomic distances, amplitudes of vibration, u, and distance corrections for the curvilinear perpendicular motion, k h1 , and refined molecular coordinates for 1 and 2 from the r h1 refinement are also provided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data were reduced to total intensities by using the program PIMAG by Strand et al [35] (version 040827) and further data reduction (yielding molecular intensity curves), the molecular structure refinement, and the electron wavelength determination (from benzene data) were performed by using version 3.0 of the ed@ed program. [36] Further details about the Bielefeld GED apparatus, the data handling, and approaches to the refinement are given in reference [37]. Full information relating to the refinement is provided in the Supporting Information: The data analysis parameters for each data set (R factors, scale factors, data ranges, weighting points, nozzle-to-plate distances, and electron wavelengths), a list of interatomic distances, amplitudes of vibration, u, and distance corrections for the curvilinear perpendicular motion, k h1 , and refined molecular coordinates for 1 and 2 from the r h1 refinement are also provided.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron diffraction patterns were recorded on the heavily improved Balzers Eldigraph KD‐G2 gas‐phase electron diffractometer36 at the University of Bielefeld. The experimental details (Table 7) are presented elsewhere 36. The electron diffraction patterns were measured on the Fuji BAS‐IP MP 2025 imaging plates, which were scanned using a calibrated Fuji BAS‐1800II scanner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…102,103 Data were collected at two different nozzle-to-detector distances, namely 250.0 (MD) and 500.0 mm (LD). The electron diffraction patterns were measured on Fuji BAS IP MP 2025 imaging plates, which were scanned using a calibrated Fuji BAS 1800II scanner.…”
Section: Comparison With Ged Datamentioning
confidence: 99%