2017
DOI: 10.1515/jamsi-2017-0011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Family of Estimators of Finite Population Mean Using Information on an Auxiliary Variable in Sample Surveys

Abstract: In this paper we have suggested a family of estimators of the population mean using auxiliary information in sample surveys. The bias and mean squared error of the proposed class of estimators have been obtained under large sample approximation. We have derived the conditions for the parameters under which the proposed class of estimators has smaller mean squared error than the sample mean, ratio, product, regression estimator and the two parameter ratio-product-ratio estimators envisaged by Chami et al (2012)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was achieved by deriving the expressions for the constant, bias, and mean square errors (MSE) of the proposed estimator. The proposed estimator was compared to ten other existing ratiotype estimators, including Sisodia and Dwivedi (SD) [16], Upadhyaya and Singh (US) [17], Singh and Tailor (ST) [18], Singh et al (SET) [19], Yan and Tain (YT) [20], Subramani and Krumarpandiyan (SK) [21], Hazara (H) [22], Jerajuddin and Kishun (JK) [23], Ijaz et al (IET) [24], and Suleiman and Adewara (SA) [25]. Three distinct sources of five natural populations were used by the present study to assess the estimators' performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved by deriving the expressions for the constant, bias, and mean square errors (MSE) of the proposed estimator. The proposed estimator was compared to ten other existing ratiotype estimators, including Sisodia and Dwivedi (SD) [16], Upadhyaya and Singh (US) [17], Singh and Tailor (ST) [18], Singh et al (SET) [19], Yan and Tain (YT) [20], Subramani and Krumarpandiyan (SK) [21], Hazara (H) [22], Jerajuddin and Kishun (JK) [23], Ijaz et al (IET) [24], and Suleiman and Adewara (SA) [25]. Three distinct sources of five natural populations were used by the present study to assess the estimators' performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%