Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '00 2000
DOI: 10.3115/1075218.1075255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved error model for noisy channel spelling correction

Abstract: The noisy channel model has been applied to a wide range of problems, including spelling correction. These models consist of two components: a source model and a channel model. Very little research has gone into improving the channel model for spelling correction.This paper describes a new channel model for spelling correction, based on generic string to string edits. Using this model gives significant performance improvements compared to previously proposed models.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
289
1
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
289
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Through decoding, we want to find the target page T that most likely lead to the observed output S. The process is visualized in Figure 1. Therefore, like in the noisy channel model (Brill and Moore, 2000), to decode the input T , we estimate the probability of T given the output observation S, P (T |S). Following Bayes' rule, the problem is characterized by Equation 2:…”
Section: Language Model-based Approach (Ufal-2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through decoding, we want to find the target page T that most likely lead to the observed output S. The process is visualized in Figure 1. Therefore, like in the noisy channel model (Brill and Moore, 2000), to decode the input T , we estimate the probability of T given the output observation S, P (T |S). Following Bayes' rule, the problem is characterized by Equation 2:…”
Section: Language Model-based Approach (Ufal-2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ahmed et al (2010) propose a spell checker that works by selecting the most promising candidates from a ranked list that is derived from n-gram statistics and lexical resources. Other approaches that correct spelling include rule-based techniques (Mangu and Brill, 1997), a noisy channel model (Brill and Moore, 2000;Toutanova and Moore, 2002) and a ternary tree search (Martins and Silva, 2004). As far as we know, little work has been made to date on the subject for Spanish, with the exception of Alonso (2010).…”
Section: Correction Candidate Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Going forward, noisychannel models [14] specifically trained on the substitution and segmentation errors of a particular OCR shape classifier, such as e->c is more likely than o->x, would seem more appropriate than blind wildcarding. That should reduce the frequency of hallucinations of incorrect dictionary words, making the language model relatively more powerful.…”
Section: Conclusion: Speech Vs Ocr and Furtherworkmentioning
confidence: 99%