2019
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01203
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Enzyme-Linked Focus Formation Assay Revealed Baloxavir Acid as a Potential Antiviral Therapeutic Against Hantavirus Infection

Abstract: Hantaviruses, etiologic pathogens responsible for two severe human diseases, exist in areas ranging from Eurasia to America and remain global public health concerns. Conventionally, plaque formation assays have been used for hantavirus titering. However, hantaviruses replicate slowly within cells and produce minimal cytopathic effects, making this technique difficult to master. The improved enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based antigen detection method is easier to perform but is still time consuming. Here, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While plaque assays are perhaps the most commonly used technique for the quantification of infectious virus, immunohistochemical focus forming assays are also commonly used for the quantification of virus [10,[16][17][18]. We have established that SARS-CoV-2 can be reliably quantified by a 96-well plate-based focus forming assay in only 24 h. When compared to traditional plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2 which require 72 h for easily quantifiable plaques, the ability to quantify infectious SARS-CoV-2 within 24 h in a 96-well plate format represents a significant advantage for studies requiring higher-throughput.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While plaque assays are perhaps the most commonly used technique for the quantification of infectious virus, immunohistochemical focus forming assays are also commonly used for the quantification of virus [10,[16][17][18]. We have established that SARS-CoV-2 can be reliably quantified by a 96-well plate-based focus forming assay in only 24 h. When compared to traditional plaque assays for SARS-CoV-2 which require 72 h for easily quantifiable plaques, the ability to quantify infectious SARS-CoV-2 within 24 h in a 96-well plate format represents a significant advantage for studies requiring higher-throughput.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While plaque assays are perhaps the most commonly used technique for the quantification of infectious virus, immunohistochemical focus forming assays are also commonly used for the quantification of virus [10,16-18]. We have established that SARS-CoV-2 can be reliably quantified by a 96 well plate-based focus forming assay in only 24 hours.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2n also resulted in being more active in in vitro assays against HTNV than two orthohantavirus candidate drugs: ETAR (1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-3-ethynyl-[1,2,4] triazole) (EC50 = 10 µ M) and Favipiravir (EC50 =150.8 μM), respectively 2-and 37-fold more potent [13,23]. Compounds 1a-c, 1e-j, 2a-n, 3f, 3j-n, and 4f, 4j-n, were evaluated for their potential inhibitory activity against HTNV using a chemiluminescence focus reduction assay (C-FRA).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, in order to obtain a titer decrease, less than 2 logs (1,78 log10) if compared to untreated control, the reference molecule ribavirin needed to be added at 50 µ M concentration. 2n also resulted in being more active in in vitro assays against HTNV than two orthohantavirus candidate drugs: ETAR (1-beta-d-ribofuranosyl-3-ethynyl- [1,2,4] triazole) (EC 50 = 10 µM) and Favipiravir (EC 50 =150.8 µM), respectively 2-and 37-fold more potent [13,23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%