1981
DOI: 10.1109/tassp.1981.1163642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved endpoint detector for isolated word recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
12

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
86
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectrum was smoothed with a moving average window of width three. Spectrograms were "noise reduced" using a modification of adaptive level equalization [8] applied to every frequency bin independently [9]. Adaptive level equalization has the effect of removing continuous background acoustic activity and setting that level to zero amplitude.…”
Section: Preprocessing Of Audio Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum was smoothed with a moving average window of width three. Spectrograms were "noise reduced" using a modification of adaptive level equalization [8] applied to every frequency bin independently [9]. Adaptive level equalization has the effect of removing continuous background acoustic activity and setting that level to zero amplitude.…”
Section: Preprocessing Of Audio Recordingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End point detection and silence removal are some of the well-known techniques for segmenting the speech. Lamel et al [8] describes endpoint detector for isolated word segmentation, where a histogram of the low 10db of log energy levels are considered to estimate the background noise. Tzanetakis and Cook [9] describe a methodology for temporal segmentation using different features such as Spectral features, MFCCs, LPC coefficients and pitch.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this technique, both the energy and zero-crossing rate of the signal are used to define the end points of an utterance. This technique is simpler to use than more advanced techniques, such as those specified by Lamel, Rabiner, Rosenburg, and Wilpon (1981); Wilpon and Rabiner (1987); Savoji (1989); and more recently by Junqua, Mak, and Reaves (1994). Some modifications were made to improve performance under the conditions used in our SVT studies at the Hearing Health Care Research Unit.…”
Section: Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%