2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10489-021-02701-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved crow search algorithm based on oppositional forgetting learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, few scholars have applied CSA in the field of electric vehicle routing problems. Although CSA offers many benefits, such as simple parameter tuning, its slow convergence speed and low convergence accuracy are still considered shortcomings, and scholars have suggested improving CSA to address these issues (Xu et al ., 2022). Therefore, hybrid heuristic algorithms that combine different algorithms are proposed to improve performance, which can be parallel or inseparable in parts (Ramachandran et al ., 2022; Tang et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few scholars have applied CSA in the field of electric vehicle routing problems. Although CSA offers many benefits, such as simple parameter tuning, its slow convergence speed and low convergence accuracy are still considered shortcomings, and scholars have suggested improving CSA to address these issues (Xu et al ., 2022). Therefore, hybrid heuristic algorithms that combine different algorithms are proposed to improve performance, which can be parallel or inseparable in parts (Ramachandran et al ., 2022; Tang et al ., 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These functions have been subject to be shifted and rotated, making it difficult to find their global optimum values. Solving these functions' global optimum solutions in low dimensions makes it possible to evaluate the performance of metaheuristic algorithms effectively(W. Xu, Zhang, & Chen, 2022). From the data in the table, it can be observed that except for function F 19 where the HI-WHO ranks second in terms of the standard deviation (Std), surpassed only by the IWHOLF algorithm, the HI-WHO achieves the best results in the remaining test cases.…”
Section: Analysis Of Optimization Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CEC2019 test functions and features are given in Table 9. The mean and standard deviation values obtained as a result of this test process were compared with the algorithms in the literature (Xu et al 2022). These algorithms are CSA (Hussien et al 2020), BOA (Arora and Singh 2019), MFO (Mirjalili 2015), BA (Yang and He 2013), WOA (Mirjalili and Lewis 2016), SCA (Mirjalili 2016), PSOGSA (Mirjalili and Hashim 2010), AGWO (Qais et al 2018), OBSCA (Abd Elaziz et al 2017, and EGWO (Joshi and Arora 2017) algorithm.…”
Section: Gauss Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 10, CSO refers to the best-performing 𝐶𝑆𝑂3 𝑃𝑖𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑤𝑖𝑠𝑒 + CSO4 Sinusoidal in previous comparisons. Results for other algorithms are taken directly from the study of Xu et al (Xu et al 2022). For a fair comparison, the population size is 50 and the maximum iteration is 10,000 in all algorithms.…”
Section: Gauss Mapmentioning
confidence: 99%