2004
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2004.832065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Improved Control Method of Buried-Type IPM Bearingless Motors Considering Magnetic Saturation and Magnetic Pull Variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the same conditions (10) simplifies to a twice rotational-speed oscillation in the first term which is a negative sine wave which F y agrees with. (ii) When p = 3, according to (11) and (12), F x and F y should have an oscillation component which is three times the rotational speed, i.e., we should see an oscillation with ¾ of a cycle. However when comparing the coefficients in (11) we will see that 4πA p (A p being the magnet MMF) is likely to be much higher than A sx sin(3θ m /2) (the suspension current MMF in the along the x-axis) and in this case this appears to be so.…”
Section: Principle Of Suspension Force Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under the same conditions (10) simplifies to a twice rotational-speed oscillation in the first term which is a negative sine wave which F y agrees with. (ii) When p = 3, according to (11) and (12), F x and F y should have an oscillation component which is three times the rotational speed, i.e., we should see an oscillation with ¾ of a cycle. However when comparing the coefficients in (11) we will see that 4πA p (A p being the magnet MMF) is likely to be much higher than A sx sin(3θ m /2) (the suspension current MMF in the along the x-axis) and in this case this appears to be so.…”
Section: Principle Of Suspension Force Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These machines are a BPM motor [11] and an inset type of motor [8]. In Table III, the maximum suspension force is divided by the rotor diameter D and stack length L. For the torque comparison, it is divided by D 2 and L. Remember that the suspension force is the vector integration of the radial stress around the airgap while the torque is the mean airgap radius multiplied by the integration of the tangential stress around the airgap.…”
Section: Comparison Of Motor Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main advantage here is that the torque and levitation force can be controlled independently. According to the location of the permanent magnet on the rotor, the PM type bearingless motor can be classified into several types, including surface permanent magnet type [16,17], inset permanent magnet type [18], interior permanent magnet type [19], consequent-pole type [20], and toothless type [21,22]. In general, if the thickness of the permanent magnet is larger, larger torque can be produced, although the radial suspension force will become smaller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These characteristics are very favourable for high performance applications, e.g., robotics, aerospace, and electric ship propulsion systems Rahman et al (1996), Ooshima et al (2004). PMSMs as traction motors are common in electric or hybrid road vehicles, but not yet widely used for rail vehicles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%