2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An improved constrained differential evolution using discrete variables (D-ICDE) for layout optimization of truss structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear that the manner of producing an 7 Complexity updated step size by using (21) is similar to mutation operation of differential evolution algorithm (DEA) in which β acts as mutation factor ranging from 0 to 2. Some studies before [55,56] have pointed out the disadvantages of DEA such as low convergence to global optimum or trapping into local optimum easily. Consequently, the proposed improvement aims to tackle the constrictions of FA by using the following expressions.…”
Section: The Second Proposed Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear that the manner of producing an 7 Complexity updated step size by using (21) is similar to mutation operation of differential evolution algorithm (DEA) in which β acts as mutation factor ranging from 0 to 2. Some studies before [55,56] have pointed out the disadvantages of DEA such as low convergence to global optimum or trapping into local optimum easily. Consequently, the proposed improvement aims to tackle the constrictions of FA by using the following expressions.…”
Section: The Second Proposed Improvementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…198.064 (6) 252.258 (7) 285.161 (8) 363.225 (9) 388.386 (10) 494.193 (11) 506.451 (12) 641.289 (13) 645.160 (14) 729.031 (15) 792.256 (16) 816.773 (17) 939.998 (18) 1008.385 (19) 1045.159 (20) 1161.288 (21) 1283.868 (22) 1374.191 (23) 1535.481 (24) 1690.319 (25) 1696.771 (26) 1858.061 (27) 1890.319 (28) 1993.544 (29) 2180.641 (30) 2238.705 (31) 2290.318 (32) 2341.931 (33) 2477.414 (34) 2496.769 (35) 2503 …”
Section: The 72-bar Spatial Truss Exampleunclassified
“…Clearly, the standard FA cannot be applied directly to deal with size and topology optimization with discrete design variables as their positions are real numbers. There are many different techniques proposed to solve this problem, such as (1) utilizing a binary-coded technique to handle discrete variables (Datta and Figueira 2011 [30], Datta and Figueira 2013 [31]), (2) replacing the continuous variables by the closest discrete variables, (3) transforming the design variable to log 10 and carrying out the algorithm operation on log 10 , (4) representing each discrete variable by an integer in ascending order and performing the algorithm operation on the integer (Ho-Huu et al 2015 [32]), and (5) forming a linking relationship between the integers and discrete variables as in technique (4) In this study, the discrete variables are arranged in ascending order. Represent each discrete variable by an integer in ascending order.…”
Section: Discretization Of Famentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICDE is the latest versions of differential evolution (DE) algorithm in order to solve constrained optimization problem [22,25,26]. It includes two main parts, the Improved (µ+λ)-differential evolution (IDE) to search in the design space and the archiving-based adaptive tradeoff model (ArATM) to handle the constraints of the problem.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithm For Reliability Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%